These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24290564)

  • 1. The impact of display angles on the legibility of Sans-Serif 5 × 5 capitalized letters.
    Cai H; Li L
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Jul; 45(4):865-77. PubMed ID: 24290564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the legibility of a single letter E viewed at different display angles.
    Cai H; Green PA; Kim JJ
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jul; 44(4):575-87. PubMed ID: 23254109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of optotypes with the Landolt ring--a fresh look at the comparability of optotypes.
    Grimm W; Rassow B; Wesemann W; Saur K; Hilz R
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Jan; 71(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8146001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Correlation of letter optotypes with Landholt ring for different degrees of visual acuity].
    Rassow B; Wang Y
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Aug; 215(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10483562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of age, viewing distance, display type, font type, colour contrast and number of syllables on the legibility of Korean characters.
    Kong YK; Lee I; Jung MC; Song YW
    Ergonomics; 2011 May; 54(5):453-65. PubMed ID: 21547790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serifs and font legibility.
    Arditi A; Cho J
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(23):2926-33. PubMed ID: 16099015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-based measurement of letter and word acuity.
    Whatham AR; Mermoud C; Déruaz A; Goldschmidt M; Zesiger P; Safran AB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Mar; 26(2):156-68. PubMed ID: 16460316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legibility variations of Chinese characters and implications for visual acuity measurement in Chinese reading population.
    Zhang JY; Zhang T; Xue F; Liu L; Yu C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2383-90. PubMed ID: 17460306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative legibility and confusions of letter acuity targets in the peripheral and central retina.
    Reich LN; Bedell HE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 May; 77(5):270-5. PubMed ID: 10831217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanpaths in reading and picture viewing: computer-assisted optimization of display conditions.
    Krischer CC; Zangemeister WH
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Jul; 37(7):947-56. PubMed ID: 17362903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Writing and reading training effects on font type and size preferences by students with low vision.
    Atasavun Uysal S; Düger T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Jun; 114(3):837-46. PubMed ID: 22913024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Letter legibility and chart equivalence.
    McMonnies CW; Ho A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Mar; 20(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 10829138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Letter legibility and the construction of a new visual acuity chart.
    Hedin A; Olsson K
    Ophthalmologica; 1984; 189(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 6493696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design of an Arabic near visual acuity chart.
    Oduntan AO; al-Abdulmunem MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Mar; 17(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 9196680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A comparison of Chinese reading parameters among rapid serial visual presentation, full screen and printed displays].
    Wang CX; Lü F; Xu D; Chen J; Xie RZ; Zhu L; Qu J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 43(8):704-8. PubMed ID: 18001567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optotype recognition under degradation: comparison of size, contrast, blur, noise and contour-perturbation effects.
    Westheimer G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jan; 99(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 26792583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a viewing strategy during adaptation to an artificial central scotoma.
    Varsori M; Perez-Fornos A; Safran AB; Whatham AR
    Vision Res; 2004 Oct; 44(23):2691-705. PubMed ID: 15358064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Smaller visual angles show greater benefit of letter boldness than larger visual angles.
    Beier S; Oderkerk CAT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Aug; 199():102904. PubMed ID: 31421483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Text legibility and the letter superiority effect.
    Sheedy JE; Subbaram MV; Zimmerman AB; Hayes JR
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):797-815. PubMed ID: 16553067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7063-70. PubMed ID: 22969070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.