477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24290695)
1. A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.
Sooriakumaran P; Srivastava A; Shariat SF; Stricker PD; Ahlering T; Eden CG; Wiklund PN; Sanchez-Salas R; Mottrie A; Lee D; Neal DE; Ghavamian R; Nyirady P; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Xylinas E; Loidl W; Seitz C; Schramek P; Roehrborn C; Cathelineau X; Skarecky D; Shaw G; Warren A; Delprado WJ; Haynes AM; Steyerberg E; Roobol MJ; Tewari AK
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 24290695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Does body habitus really make a difference ?
Albisinni S; Grosman J; Aoun F; Quackels T; Peltier A; Van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T
Prog Urol; 2018 Jun; 28(8-9):434-441. PubMed ID: 29789234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.
Cadeddu JA
J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):1984-5. PubMed ID: 25986795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) radical prostatectomy audit 2014/2015 - an update on current practice and outcomes by centre and surgeon case-volume.
Khadhouri S; Miller C; Fowler S; Hounsome L; McNeill A; Adshead J; McGrath JS;
BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):886-892. PubMed ID: 29388311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Between Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy at 24-month Follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO Trial.
Nyberg M; Hugosson J; Wiklund P; Sjoberg D; Wilderäng U; Carlsson SV; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Steineck G; Haglind E; Bjartell A;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):353-360. PubMed ID: 31158073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Robotic fatigue?" - The impact of case order on positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Bukavina L; Mishra K; Mahran A; Fernstrum A; Ray A; Markt S; Schumacher F; Conroy B; Abouassaly R; MacLennan G; Smith G; Ferry E; Wong D; Lotan Y; Chaparala H; Sharp D; Alazem K; Moinzadeh A; Adamic B; Zagaja G; Kang P; Lawry H; Lee B; Calaway A; Ponsky L
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):365.e17-365.e23. PubMed ID: 33160844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database.
Vesey SG; McCabe JE; Hounsome L; Fowler S
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 21771246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Experience on the Risk of Surgical Margins and Biochemical Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Learning Curve Study.
Bravi CA; Tin A; Vertosick E; Mazzone E; Martini A; Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Gallina A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Vickers A
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 30747873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Re: Prasanna Sooriakumaran, Abhishek Srivastava, Shahrokh F. Shariat, et al. A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22,393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.018.
Giannarini G; Suardi N; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):e89-90. PubMed ID: 24447574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Population Based Cohort.
Pearce SM; Pariser JJ; Karrison T; Patel SG; Eggener SE
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 26860793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk Factors for Intraprostatic Incision into Malignant Glands at Radical Prostatectomy.
Park SW; Readal N; Jeong BC; Humphreys EB; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 25088822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy after Previous Bladder Outlet Surgery: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Comparative Studies.
Veccia A; Antonelli A; Francavilla S; Porpiglia F; Simeone C; Lima E; Zargar H; Eun D; Hampton LJ; Autorino R
J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):511-517. PubMed ID: 31039100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center.
Asimakopoulos AD; Annino F; Mugnier C; Lopez L; Hoepffner JL; Gaston R; Piechaud T
Surg Endosc; 2021 Dec; 35(12):6731-6745. PubMed ID: 33289056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.
Sooriakumaran P; Pini G; Nyberg T; Derogar M; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Steineck G; Wiklund PN
Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):618-627. PubMed ID: 28882327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The association between nerve sparing and a positive surgical margin during radical prostatectomy.
Preston MA; Breau RH; Lantz AG; Morash C; Gerridzen RG; Doucette S; Mallick R; Eastham JA; Cagiannos I
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jan; 33(1):18.e1-18.e6. PubMed ID: 25308562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
