These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24291000)

  • 1. Ionizing radiation doses during lower limb torsion and anteversion measurements by EOS stereoradiography and computed tomography.
    Delin C; Silvera S; Bassinet C; Thelen P; Rehel JL; Legmann P; Folinais D
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):371-7. PubMed ID: 24291000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Femoral Torsion: Impact of Femur Position on CT and Stereoradiography Measurements.
    Morvan G; Guerini H; Carré G; Vuillemin V
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):W93-W99. PubMed ID: 28570094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring femoral and rotational alignment: EOS system versus computed tomography.
    Folinais D; Thelen P; Delin C; Radier C; Catonne Y; Lazennec JY
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 99(5):509-16. PubMed ID: 23877073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of radiation dose estimates and scan performance in pediatric high-resolution thoracic CT for volumetric 320-detector row, helical 64-detector row, and noncontiguous axial scan acquisitions.
    Podberesky DJ; Angel E; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Salisbury SR; Brody AS; Alsip C; Barelli A; Egelhoff JC; Anderson-Evans C; Nguyen GB; Dow D; Frush DP
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):1152-61. PubMed ID: 23931430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study.
    Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Bosmans H; Hermans R; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Oct; 12(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 11564107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of the optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) technique for mouse dosimetry in micro-CT imaging.
    Vrigneaud JM; Courteau A; Ranouil J; Morgand L; Raguin O; Walker P; Oudot A; Collin B; Brunotte F
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):122102. PubMed ID: 24320529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
    Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation exposure in perfusion CT of the brain.
    Ringelstein A; Lechel U; Fahrendorf DM; Altenbernd JC; Forsting M; Schlamann M
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 24378887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality.
    Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation dose in dental radiology.
    Cohnen M; Kemper J; Möbes O; Pawelzik J; Mödder U
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Mar; 12(3):634-7. PubMed ID: 11870479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control.
    Israel GM; Cicchiello L; Brink J; Huda W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1342-6. PubMed ID: 21098193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Femoral and tibial torsion measurement in children and adolescents: comparison of 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiography and low-dose CT.
    Rosskopf AB; Ramseier LE; Sutter R; Pfirrmann CW; Buck FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W285-91. PubMed ID: 24555627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
    Glaser DA; Doan J; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1391-7. PubMed ID: 22415001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated computed tomography dose-saving algorithm to protect radiosensitive tissues: estimation of radiation exposure and image quality considerations.
    Ketelsen D; Buchgeister M; Fenchel M; Schmidt B; Flohr TG; Syha R; Thomas C; Tsiflikas I; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 21934513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping.
    Gordic S; Morsbach F; Schmidt B; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Husarik D; Baumueller S; Raupach R; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):465-73. PubMed ID: 24598443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
    Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans.
    Desai GS; Fuentes Orrego JM; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 24270111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Nikupaavo U; Kaasalainen T; Reijonen V; Ahonen SM; Kortesniemi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25539246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of Organ Dose Calculation Using Monte Carlo Simulation and In-phantom Dosimetry in CT Examination].
    Iriuchijima A; Fukushima Y; Ogura A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 29459544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.