130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24292296)
1. Evaluation of the results of operative management of lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Islam MS; Ara R; Salam MA; Rahman MW; Alam MJ; Karim MR; Rahman M; Alam MN; Hussain MF
Mymensingh Med J; 2013 Oct; 22(4):676-83. PubMed ID: 24292296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome of Operative Management of Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis at Mymensingh Medical College & Hospital.
Islam MS; Ara R; Saha MK; Roy MK; Rahman MM; Islam MA; Kamruzzaman M; Alam MT; Sayed KA; Dhar LK; Alam MK; Islam MN; Ara R; Khan TF
Mymensingh Med J; 2020 Jul; 29(3):560-567. PubMed ID: 32844794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spinous process splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a critical appraisal.
Lee DY; Lee SH
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Aug; 51(4):204-7. PubMed ID: 18683110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.
Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ
Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients.
Rajasekaran S; Thomas A; Kanna RM; Prasad Shetty A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):1737-43. PubMed ID: 23797498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical outcomes of decompressive laminectomy by transspinous approach for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ücer M; Aydin I; Tacyildiz AE; Dogan I; Emel E
J Pak Med Assoc; 2018 Nov; 68(11):1618-1624. PubMed ID: 30410142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 2D Operative Video.
Gagliardi M; Guiroy A; Sícoli A; Masanés NG; Ciancio AM; Asghar J
World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():107. PubMed ID: 34971829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.
Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Rossvoll I; Andresen H; Storheim K; Zwart JA; Nygaard ØP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 25575084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Lateral fenestration combined with spinal canal decompression through contralateral laminotomy for radiculopathy caused by lumbar canal stenosis and lumbar foraminal stenosis: a case report].
Sasaki M; Aoki M; Yoshimine T
No Shinkei Geka; 2010 May; 38(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 20522920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrospective Matched-Pair Cohort Study on Effect of Bisegmental Fenestration versus Hemilaminectomy for Bisegmental Spinal Canal Stenosis at L3-L4 and L4-L5.
Schüppel J; Weber F
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 78(5):431-439. PubMed ID: 28068753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Chimney sublaminar decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lin SM; Tseng SH; Yang JC; Tu CC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 May; 4(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 16703902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of single posterior decompressive laminectomy in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study.
Kaymaz M; Borcek AO; Emmez H; Durdag E; Pasaoglu A
Turk Neurosurg; 2012; 22(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 22843459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Lateral Spinal Canal Stenosis: Classification of Lateral Region of Lumbar Spinal Canal and Surgical Approaches.
Wang Y; Dou Q; Yang J; Zhang L; Yan Y; Peng Z; Guo C; Kong Q
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e276-e283. PubMed ID: 30053559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results.
Hwa Eum J; Hwa Heo D; Son SK; Park CK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Apr; 24(4):602-7. PubMed ID: 26722954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a minimal invasive surgery.
Usman M; Ali M; Khanzada K; Ishaq M; Naeem-ul-Haq ; Aman R; Ali M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Dec; 23(12):852-6. PubMed ID: 24304987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
Deer TR; Kim CK; Bowman RG; Ranson MT; Yee BS
Pain Physician; 2012; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
