These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm. van Ooij P; Potters WV; Guédon A; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 23417769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D cine phase-contrast MRI at 3T in intracranial aneurysms compared with patient-specific computational fluid dynamics. van Ooij P; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; van Bavel E; Nederveen AJ AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013 Sep; 34(9):1785-91. PubMed ID: 23598829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. van Ooij P; Guédon A; Poelma C; Schneiders J; Rutten MC; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; VanBavel E; Nederveen AJ NMR Biomed; 2012 Jan; 25(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21480417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics--preliminary experience. Karmonik C; Klucznik R; Benndorf G Rofo; 2008 Mar; 180(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 18278729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. Hollnagel DI; Summers PE; Poulikakos D; Kollias SS NMR Biomed; 2009 Oct; 22(8):795-808. PubMed ID: 19412933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-patient variations in flow boundary conditions at middle cerebral artery from 7T PC-MRI and influence on Computational Fluid Dynamics of intracranial aneurysms. Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H; van Ooij P; Veeturi SS; Tutino VM; Zwanenburg JJ; Meng H Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103759. PubMed ID: 32421656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD. Roloff C; Stucht D; Beuing O; Berg P J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 30061369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimizing the blood velocity differences between phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics simulation in cerebral arteries and aneurysms. Mohd Adib MAH; Ii S; Watanabe Y; Wada S Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Sep; 55(9):1605-1619. PubMed ID: 28161877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comprehensive validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations of in-vivo blood flow in patient-specific cerebral aneurysms. Sun Q; Groth A; Aach T Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):742-54. PubMed ID: 22320784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of velocity patterns in an AComA aneurysm measured with 2D phase contrast MRI and simulated with CFD. Karmonik C; Klucznik R; Benndorf G Technol Health Care; 2008; 16(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 18487858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Using Morphological and Hemodynamic Biomarkers Evaluated from Magnetic Resonance Fluid Dynamics and Computational Fluid Dynamics. Perera R; Isoda H; Ishiguro K; Mizuno T; Takehara Y; Terada M; Tanoi C; Naito T; Sakahara H; Hiramatsu H; Namba H; Izumi T; Wakabayashi T; Kosugi T; Onishi Y; Alley M; Komori Y; Ikeda M; Naganawa S Magn Reson Med Sci; 2020 Dec; 19(4):333-344. PubMed ID: 31956175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flow visualization of recurrent aneurysms after coil embolization by 3D phase-contrast MRI. Kono K; Terada T Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2014 Nov; 156(11):2035-40. PubMed ID: 25257134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]