BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24292494)

  • 1. Direction-dependent differences in temporal kinematics for vertical prehension movements.
    Yamamoto S; Kushiro K
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Feb; 232(2):703-11. PubMed ID: 24292494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trajectories of arm pointing movements on the sagittal plane vary with both direction and speed.
    Papaxanthis C; Pozzo T; Schieppati M
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Feb; 148(4):498-503. PubMed ID: 12582833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of cutaneous feedback for anticipatory grip force adjustments during object movements and externally imposed variation of the direction of gravity.
    Nowak DA; Glasauer S; Meyer L; Mait N; Hermsdörfer J
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2002; 19(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 11962646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Control of prehension in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: similarities and differences between the ipsi- and contra-lesional sides of the body.
    Steenbergen B; van der Kamp J
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2004 May; 46(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 15132263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Muscle effort is best minimized by the right-dominant arm in the gravity field.
    Poirier G; Papaxanthis C; Mourey F; Lebigre M; Gaveau J
    J Neurophysiol; 2022 Apr; 127(4):1117-1126. PubMed ID: 35353617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motor control of downward object-transport movements with precision grip by object weight.
    Yamamoto S; Shiraki Y; Uehara S; Kushiro K
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2016 Jun; 33(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 27430351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of movement direction upon kinematic characteristics of vertical arm pointing movements in man.
    Papaxanthis C; Pozzo T; Stapley P
    Neurosci Lett; 1998 Sep; 253(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 9774160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Drawing movements and gravitational force: central or peripheral regulation?].
    Papaxanthis C; Pozzo T; Van Hoecke J; Vinter A; Skoura X
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1998; 192(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 9759362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motor planning of arm movements is direction-dependent in the gravity field.
    Gentili R; Cahouet V; Papaxanthis C
    Neuroscience; 2007 Mar; 145(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 17224242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study.
    Grosskopf A; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):230-40. PubMed ID: 16078023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Arm end-point trajectories under normal and micro-gravity environments.
    Papaxanthis C; Pozzo T; McIntyre J
    Acta Astronaut; 1998; 43(3-6):153-61. PubMed ID: 11541921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hand trajectories of vertical arm movements in one-G and zero-G environments. Evidence for a central representation of gravitational force.
    Papaxanthis C; Pozzo T; Popov KE; McIntyre J
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 120(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 9655235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The representation of gravitational force during drawing movements of the arm.
    Papaxanthis C; Pozzo T; Vinter A; Grishin A
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 May; 120(2):233-42. PubMed ID: 9629965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The temporal structure of vertical arm movements.
    Gaveau J; Papaxanthis C
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22045. PubMed ID: 21765935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Movements of individual digits in bimanual prehension are coupled into a grasping component.
    Zaal FT; Bongers RM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e97790. PubMed ID: 24870948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Energy-related optimal control accounts for gravitational load: comparing shoulder, elbow, and wrist rotations.
    Gaveau J; Berret B; Demougeot L; Fadiga L; Pozzo T; Papaxanthis C
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Jan; 111(1):4-16. PubMed ID: 24133223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 21938544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment.
    Magdalon EC; Michaelsen SM; Quevedo AA; Levin MF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 21684505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The destination defines the journey: an examination of the kinematics of hand-to-mouth movements.
    Flindall JW; Gonzalez CL
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Nov; 116(5):2105-2113. PubMed ID: 27512020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.