165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24293178)
1. Single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Vado A; Menardi E; Rossetti G; Ballari G; Feola M; Bobbio M
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Mar; 39(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 24293178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study.
Forleo GB; Mantica M; Di Biase L; Panattoni G; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Santamaria M; Santangeli P; Avella A; Sergi D; Santini L; Tondo C; Natale A; Romeo F
Heart Rhythm; 2012 Nov; 9(11):1822-8. PubMed ID: 22841876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients with Quadripolar LV Leads: The EffaceQ Study.
Oswald H; Asbach S; Köbe J; Weglage H; Schulte-Pitzke B; Brachmann J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 38(8):942-50. PubMed ID: 25974406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of a novel left ventricular lead with short bipolar spacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: primary results of the Attain Performa quadripolar left ventricular lead study.
Crossley GH; Biffi M; Johnson B; Lin A; Gras D; Hussin A; Cuffio A; Collier JL; El-Chami M; Li S; Holloman K; Exner DV
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Apr; 12(4):751-8. PubMed ID: 25533587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.
Behar JM; Bostock J; Zhu Li AP; Chin HM; Jubb S; Lent E; Gamble J; Foley PW; Betts TR; Rinaldi CA; Herring N
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 May; 26(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 25631303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study.
Forleo GB; Di Biase L; Panattoni G; Mantica M; Parisi Q; Martino A; Pappalardo A; Sergi D; Tesauro M; Papavasileiou LP; Santini L; Calò L; Tondo C; Natale A; Romeo F
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25504267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance and clinical comparison between left ventricular quadripolar and bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Observational research.
Ziacchi M; Zucchelli G; Ricciardi D; Morani G; De Ruvo E; Calzolari V; Viani S; Calabrese V; Tomasi L; Calò L; De Mattia L; Bongiorni MG; Boriani G; Biffi M
Indian Heart J; 2018; 70(6):864-871. PubMed ID: 30580858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes.
Forleo GB; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Molfetta AD; Santini L; Romeo F
Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jan; 8(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 20887804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of a quadripolar left ventricular lead to achieve successful implantation in patients with previous failed attempts at cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Shetty AK; Duckett SG; Bostock J; Rosenthal E; Rinaldi CA
Europace; 2011 Jul; 13(7):992-6. PubMed ID: 21343237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term follow-up of patients with a quadripolar active fixation left ventricular lead: An Italian multicenter experience.
De Regibus V; Biffi M; Infusino T; Savastano S; Landolina M; Palmisano P; Foti R; Facchin D; Dello Russo A; Urraro F; Ziacchi M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1567-1575. PubMed ID: 35634866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.
Leyva F; Zegard A; Qiu T; Acquaye E; Ferrante G; Walton J; Marshall H
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 29042422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical efficacy of left ventricular pacing vector programmability in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator patients for management of phrenic nerve stimulation and/or elevated left ventricular pacing thresholds: insights from the Efface Phrenic Stim study.
Klein N; Klein M; Weglage H; Przibille O; Fischer S; Trappe HJ; Birkenhauer F; Pfeiffer D;
Europace; 2012 Jun; 14(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 22277645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elimination of phrenic nerve stimulation occurring during CRT: follow-up in patients implanted with a novel quadripolar pacing lead.
Mehta PA; Shetty AK; Squirrel M; Bostock J; Rinaldi CA
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 21833513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of quadripolar left ventricular leads improves the hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Osca J; Alonso P; Cano Ó; Sánchez JM; Tejada D; Andrés A; Sancho Tello MJ; Olagüe J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Mar; 38(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 25492127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Novel Quadripolar Active Fixation Left-Ventricular Pacing Lead for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Initial United Kingdom Experience.
Chapman M; Bates MGD; Behar JM; Williams I; Dewhurst M; Monkhouse C; Hayward C; Muthumala A; Chow A; Linker NJ; Thornley AR; Turley AJ
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2019 Sep; 5(9):1028-1035. PubMed ID: 31537331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement in hemodynamic response using a quadripolar LV lead.
Cabrera Bueno F; Alzueta Rodríguez J; Olagüe de Ros J; Fernández-Lozano I; García Guerrero JJ; de la Concha JF; Hernández Madrid A; Tolosana Viu JM; Osca Asensi J; Barrera Cordero A; Llorente Hernangómez E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Aug; 36(8):963-9. PubMed ID: 23692289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of Anatomically Designed Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads: Results from the NAVIGATE X4 Clinical Trial.
Mittal S; Nair D; Padanilam BJ; Ciuffo A; Gupta N; Gallagher P; Goldner B; Hammill EF; Wold N; Stein K; Burke M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1199-1205. PubMed ID: 27434039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter- and intravein differences in cardiac output with cardiac resynchronization pacing using a multipolar LV pacing lead.
Jones MA; Khiani R; Foley P; Webster D; Qureshi N; Wong KC; Rajappan K; Bashir Y; Betts TR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 38(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 25414088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Application and efficacy of the adjustment on left ventricular electrical delay and the distance between right and left ventricular pacing polar in optimizing the left ventricular pacing polar].
Yan XL; Liang YC; Yu HB; Xu BG; Gao Y; Liu R; Xu GQ; Wu M
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 48(8):669-674. PubMed ID: 32847323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site.
Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Marcantoni L; Fraccaro C; Lanza D; Picariello C; Aggio S; Roncon L; Dell'Avvocata F; Rigatelli G; Pacetta D; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
Heart Rhythm; 2015 May; 12(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 25625721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
