172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24293651)
1. Conformations of p53 response elements in solution deduced using site-directed spin labeling and Monte Carlo sampling.
Zhang X; Dantas Machado AC; Ding Y; Chen Y; Lu Y; Duan Y; Tham KW; Chen L; Rohs R; Qin PZ
Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Feb; 42(4):2789-97. PubMed ID: 24293651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structure of p53 binding to the BAX response element reveals DNA unwinding and compression to accommodate base-pair insertion.
Chen Y; Zhang X; Dantas Machado AC; Ding Y; Chen Z; Qin PZ; Rohs R; Chen L
Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Sep; 41(17):8368-76. PubMed ID: 23836939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The complex architecture of p53 binding sites.
Senitzki A; Safieh J; Sharma V; Golovenko D; Danin-Poleg Y; Inga A; Haran TE
Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Feb; 49(3):1364-1382. PubMed ID: 33444431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Alu repeats on the evolution of human p53 binding sites.
Cui F; Sirotin MV; Zhurkin VB
Biol Direct; 2011 Jan; 6():2. PubMed ID: 21208455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Probing the functional impact of sequence variation on p53-DNA interactions using a novel microsphere assay for protein-DNA binding with human cell extracts.
Noureddine MA; Menendez D; Campbell MR; Bandele OJ; Horvath MM; Wang X; Pittman GS; Chorley BN; Resnick MA; Bell DA
PLoS Genet; 2009 May; 5(5):e1000462. PubMed ID: 19424414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New Insights into the Role of DNA Shape on Its Recognition by p53 Proteins.
Golovenko D; Bräuning B; Vyas P; Haran TE; Rozenberg H; Shakked Z
Structure; 2018 Sep; 26(9):1237-1250.e6. PubMed ID: 30057026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diverse p53/DNA binding modes expand the repertoire of p53 response elements.
Vyas P; Beno I; Xi Z; Stein Y; Golovenko D; Kessler N; Rotter V; Shakked Z; Haran TE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(40):10624-10629. PubMed ID: 28912355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electron microscopy studies on the quaternary structure of p53 reveal different binding modes for p53 tetramers in complex with DNA.
Melero R; Rajagopalan S; Lázaro M; Joerger AC; Brandt T; Veprintsev DB; Lasso G; Gil D; Scheres SH; Carazo JM; Fersht AR; Valle M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jan; 108(2):557-62. PubMed ID: 21178074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Crystal structures of the DNA-binding domain tetramer of the p53 tumor suppressor family member p73 bound to different full-site response elements.
Ethayathulla AS; Nguyen HT; Viadiu H
J Biol Chem; 2013 Feb; 288(7):4744-54. PubMed ID: 23243311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distinct mechanisms control genome recognition by p53 at its target genes linked to different cell fates.
Farkas M; Hashimoto H; Bi Y; Davuluri RV; Resnick-Silverman L; Manfredi JJ; Debler EW; McMahon SB
Nat Commun; 2021 Jan; 12(1):484. PubMed ID: 33473123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Symphony of the DNA flexibility and sequence environment orchestrates p53 binding to its responsive elements.
Vanaja A; Mallick SP; Kulandaivelu U; Kumar A; Yella VR
Gene; 2021 Nov; 803():145892. PubMed ID: 34375633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Integrated Spin-Labeling/Computational-Modeling Approach for Mapping Global Structures of Nucleic Acids.
Tangprasertchai NS; Zhang X; Ding Y; Tham K; Rohs R; Haworth IS; Qin PZ
Methods Enzymol; 2015; 564():427-53. PubMed ID: 26477260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two p53 tetramers bind one consensus DNA response element.
Kearns S; Lurz R; Orlova EV; Okorokov AL
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jul; 44(13):6185-99. PubMed ID: 27034469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quaternary structures of tumor suppressor p53 and a specific p53 DNA complex.
Tidow H; Melero R; Mylonas E; Freund SM; Grossmann JG; Carazo JM; Svergun DI; Valle M; Fersht AR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jul; 104(30):12324-9. PubMed ID: 17620598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Crystal structure of a multidomain human p53 tetramer bound to the natural CDKN1A (p21) p53-response element.
Emamzadah S; Tropia L; Halazonetis TD
Mol Cancer Res; 2011 Nov; 9(11):1493-9. PubMed ID: 21933903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lysine120 interactions with p53 response elements can allosterically direct p53 organization.
Pan Y; Nussinov R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 20700496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The p53 C terminus controls site-specific DNA binding and promotes structural changes within the central DNA binding domain.
Laptenko O; Shiff I; Freed-Pastor W; Zupnick A; Mattia M; Freulich E; Shamir I; Kadouri N; Kahan T; Manfredi J; Simon I; Prives C
Mol Cell; 2015 Mar; 57(6):1034-1046. PubMed ID: 25794615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamics and Molecular Mechanisms of p53 Transcriptional Activation.
Offutt TL; Ieong PU; Demir Ö; Amaro RE
Biochemistry; 2018 Nov; 57(46):6528-6537. PubMed ID: 30388364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. p53 dynamics upon response element recognition explored by molecular simulations.
Terakawa T; Takada S
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():17107. PubMed ID: 26596470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic interactions of p53 with DNA in solution by time-lapse atomic force microscopy.
Jiao Y; Cherny DI; Heim G; Jovin TM; Schäffer TE
J Mol Biol; 2001 Nov; 314(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 11718557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
