133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24294857)
1. [Application of fluorescence in situ hybridization on archived bone marrow smears in retrospective diagnosis of hematologic malignancies].
Wang T; Cao W; Yin Y; Zhang Y; Zhang QJ; Wang CF; Li HH; Liu HX; Tong CR
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 34(11):974-6. PubMed ID: 24294857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for inadequate bone marrow biopsies in children.
Grant RC; Shaikh F; Abdelhaleem M; Alexander SW; Cada M
Am J Hematol; 2015 Sep; 90(9):E187-9. PubMed ID: 26043864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. DIAGNOSTIC IMPORTANCE OF BONE MARROW EXAMINATION IN HAEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANT AND NON-MALIGNANT DISORDERS.
Gandapur AS; Nadeem S; Riaz M; Modood-ul-Mannan
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2015; 27(3):692-4. PubMed ID: 26721042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluorescence in situ hybridization panel for monitoring of minimal residual disease in patients with double minute chromosomes.
Jeon Y; Kim SY; Kim M; Park HK; Lee SH; See CJ; Kwon J; Lee DS
Blood Cells Mol Dis; 2014 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 24211232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Examination of the bone marrow.
Jenkins C; Karunanithi K; Hewamana S
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2008 Aug; 69(8):M124-7. PubMed ID: 18783097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The usefulness of bone marrow biopsy in haematology (author's transl)].
Campuzano G; Bedoya V; Restrepo A; Maya LM
Sangre (Barc); 1978; 23(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 653549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Detection of the Mbcr/abl translocation using FISH in bone marrow samples from patients diagnosed with CML and ALL].
Vargas MT; Fernández-Novoa MC; García-Creus MD; González-Ruano J
Sangre (Barc); 1996 Oct; 41(5):399-400. PubMed ID: 9026927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of bone marrow involvement in malignant lymphoma using fluorescence in situ hybridization: possible utility in the detection of micrometastasis.
Huh HJ; Min HC; Cho HI; Chae SL; Lee DS
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2008 Oct; 186(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18786435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revisiting Bone Marrow Core Biopsy Adequacy Criteria in the Era of Extensive Ancillary Testing.
O'Neill SS; Wong TC; Parris J; Chao HH; Mathews SP; Rollins-Raval MA; Fedoriw Y
Clin Lab; 2019 Sep; 65(9):. PubMed ID: 31532106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patterns of hematological and non-hematological malignancies in bone marrow in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal--11 years study.
Ghartimagar D; Ghosh A; Narasimhan R; Talwar OP
Nepal Med Coll J; 2012 Sep; 14(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 24047012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indications and diagnostic utility of bone marrow examination in different bone marrow disorders in Iran.
Mirzai AZ; Hosseini N; Sadeghipour A
Lab Hematol; 2009; 15(4):38-44. PubMed ID: 19923104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for monitoring hematologic malignancies with BCR/ABL or ETO/AML1 rearrangement: a comparative study with FISH and G-banding on 919 consecutive specimens of hematologic malignancies.
Lee DY; Cho HI; Kang YH; Yun SS; Park SY; Lee YS; Kim Y; Lee DS
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Jul; 152(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 15193435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metastatic neoplasms of bone marrow. Clinical and morphological analysis of 71 cases.
Zheng TL; Li DG; Zhang ZN; Cao JN; Li GX
Chin Med J (Engl); 1985 May; 98(5):321-4. PubMed ID: 3926402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fundamentals of bone marrow examination.
Hyun BH; Stevenson AJ; Hanau CA
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1994 Aug; 8(4):651-63. PubMed ID: 7525532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DRAQ5-based, no-lyse, no-wash bone marrow aspirate evaluation by flow cytometry.
Allan RW; Ansari-Lari MA; Jordan S
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 May; 129(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 18426729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Bone marrow aspiration puncture biopsy in hematologic diagnosis].
Ponzinibbio C; Monsalve C; Laguens RP
Medicina (B Aires); 1980; 40(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 7432144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of touch imprints with aspirate smears for evaluating bone marrow specimens.
Aboul-Nasr R; Estey EH; Kantarjian HM; Freireich EJ; Andreeff M; Johnson BJ; Albitar M
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jun; 111(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 10361510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Application of bioptic bone marrow imprint in diagnosis of anemia].
Zhang H; Hu B
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Apr; 10(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 12513815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone marrow evaluation for pediatric patients.
Proytcheva M
Int J Lab Hematol; 2013 Jun; 35(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 23590656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Necessity of bilateral bone marrow biopsies for ancillary cytogenetic studies in the pediatric population.
Grimm KE; Chen C; Weiss LM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Dec; 134(6):982-6. PubMed ID: 21088163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
