These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24294915)

  • 1. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):645-659. PubMed ID: 24294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes.
    Laub R; Frings C; Moeller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1474-1488. PubMed ID: 29687358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contextual modulation of prime response retrieval processes: Evidence from auditory negative priming.
    Mayr S; Möller M; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 30094603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why star retrieves scar: Binding and retrieval of perceptual distractor features.
    Laub R; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):350-363. PubMed ID: 31180703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Five shades of grey: Generalization in distractor-based retrieval of S-R episodes.
    Singh T; Moeller B; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2307-2312. PubMed ID: 27631631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distractor-based stimulus-response bindings retrieve decisions independent of motor programs.
    Nett N; Bröder A; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Nov; 171():57-64. PubMed ID: 27665268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loss of attentional inhibition in older adults--Does it really exist? An experimental dissociation of inhibitory and memory retrieval processes.
    Giesen C; Eberhard M; Rothermund K
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Jun; 30(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 25961880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets.
    Frings C; Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Oct; 60(10):1367-77. PubMed ID: 17853245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.
    Moeller B; Frings C; Pfister R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):464-79. PubMed ID: 26501840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociating distractor inhibition and episodic retrieval processes in children: No evidence for developmental deficits.
    Giesen C; Weissmann F; Rothermund K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():212-231. PubMed ID: 28946043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated.
    Frings C; Moeller B; Rothermund K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):700-9. PubMed ID: 23392625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distractor-based retrieval in action control: the influence of encoding specificity.
    Laub R; Frings C
    Psychol Res; 2020 Apr; 84(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 30173278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the decay of distractor-response episodes.
    Frings C
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 20705549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does feature-based attention play a role in the episodic retrieval of event files?
    Huffman G; Hilchey MD; Weidler BJ; Mills M; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):241-251. PubMed ID: 32077740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. To be or not to be...included in an event file: integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping.
    Frings C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1209-27. PubMed ID: 21707218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separating after-effects of target and distractor processing in the tactile sensory modality.
    Wesslein AK; Moeller B; Frings C; Giesen C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):809-822. PubMed ID: 30628034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The level of representation of irrelevant stimuli-Distractor-response binding within and between the senses.
    Laub R; Merz S; Dröschel H; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2256-2266. PubMed ID: 33768482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From hands to feet: Abstract response representations in distractor-response bindings.
    Moeller B; Hommel B; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():69-75. PubMed ID: 26047973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adapting to stimulus-response contingencies without noticing them.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1475-81. PubMed ID: 26389614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repetition priming and repetition blindness: Effects of an intervening distractor word.
    Leggett JMI; Burt JS; Ceccato JM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Jun; 73(2):105-117. PubMed ID: 30896186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.