These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24294917)

  • 1. Individual differences in contextual storage: evidence from the list-strength effect.
    Sahakyan L; Abushanab B; Smith JR; Gray KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):873-81. PubMed ID: 24294917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. List-strength effects in older adults in recognition and free recall.
    Sahakyan L
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):764-778. PubMed ID: 30607754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency.
    Miller AL; Unsworth N
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1149-1163. PubMed ID: 29845592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.
    Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1020-34. PubMed ID: 17983310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 21090906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contributions of primary and secondary memory to working memory capacity: an individual differences analysis of immediate free recall.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):240-7. PubMed ID: 20053060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Item-method directed forgetting and working memory capacity: A hierarchical multinomial modeling approach.
    Marevic I; Arnold NR; Rummel J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1070-1080. PubMed ID: 28326968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: an examination of differences in accessibility.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2397-410. PubMed ID: 22800472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The list-strength effect in recall: relative-strength competition and retrieval inhibition may both contribute to forgetting.
    Verde MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):205-20. PubMed ID: 19210091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variation in working memory capacity and temporal-contextual retrieval from episodic memory.
    Spillers GJ; Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1532-9. PubMed ID: 21823812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall.
    Unsworth N
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):386-96. PubMed ID: 19358013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.
    Rose NS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Dec; 67(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 24341741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpolated retrieval effects on list isolation: Individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Kane MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):619-642. PubMed ID: 30725377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in working memory capacity and episodic recall: the contributions of strategic encoding and contextual retrieval.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 20382920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect.
    Ensor TM; Bancroft TD; Guitard D; Bireta TJ; Hockley WE; Surprenant AM
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Jul; 67(4):255-275. PubMed ID: 33111659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working memory capacity and retrieval from long-term memory: the role of controlled search.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Feb; 41(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 23055120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory predicts the rejection of false memories.
    Leding JK
    Memory; 2012; 20(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 22292532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Control processes in short-term storage: Retrieval strategies in immediate recall depend upon the number of words to be recalled.
    Ward G; Tan L
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):658-682. PubMed ID: 30617748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic search and working memory in social recall.
    Hills TT; Pachur T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):218-28. PubMed ID: 21859235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The components of working memory updating: an experimental decomposition and individual differences.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Oberauer K; Chee AE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):170-89. PubMed ID: 20053053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.