These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24294917)

  • 21. Working memory capacity predicts the beneficial effect of selective memory retrieval.
    Schlichting A; Aslan A; Holterman C; Bäuml KH
    Memory; 2015; 23(5):786-94. PubMed ID: 24946840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Working memory capacity and recall from long-term memory: Examining the influences of encoding strategies, study time allocation, search efficiency, and monitoring abilities.
    Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26076331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal clustering and sequencing in short-term memory and episodic memory.
    Farrell S
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Apr; 119(2):223-71. PubMed ID: 22506678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion.
    Ratcliff R; Clark SE; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Mar; 16(2):163-78. PubMed ID: 2137859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the effects of list length and output order.
    Ward G; Tan L; Grenfell-Essam R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1207-41. PubMed ID: 20804293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of working memory capacity in autobiographical retrieval: individual differences in strategic search.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
    Memory; 2012; 20(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 22273543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The contribution of encoding and retrieval processes to proactive interference.
    Kliegl O; Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1778-89. PubMed ID: 25603166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
    Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The hard fall effect: high working memory capacity leads to a higher, but less robust short-term memory performance.
    Thomassin N; Gonthier C; Guerraz M; Roulin JL
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 25384644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interference within the focus of attention: working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance.
    Shipstead Z; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):277-89. PubMed ID: 22612165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Variation in working memory capacity and episodic memory: examining the importance of encoding specificity.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 21912997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Memory for temporal context: effects of ageing, encoding instructions, and retrieval strategies.
    Bastin C; Van der Linden M
    Memory; 2005 Jan; 13(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 15724911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lapsed attention to elapsed time? Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal reproduction.
    Broadway JM; Engle RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21470583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A buffer model of memory encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval.
    Lehman M; Malmberg KJ
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jan; 120(1):155-89. PubMed ID: 23230891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Covert retrieval in working memory impacts the phenomenological characteristics remembered during episodic memory.
    Loaiza VM; Borovanska BM
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Jan; 57():20-32. PubMed ID: 29156216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effectiveness of test-enhanced learning depends on trait test anxiety and working-memory capacity.
    Tse CS; Pu X
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Sep; 18(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 22774786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Picture span test: measuring visual working memory capacity involved in remembering and comprehension.
    Tanabe A; Osaka N
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 19363171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does collaboration help or hurt recall? The answer depends on working memory capacity.
    Hood AVB; Whillock SR; Meade ML; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Mar; 49(3):350-370. PubMed ID: 36006719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interference from retrieval cues in Parkinson's disease.
    Crescentini C; Marin D; Del Missier F; Biasutti E; Shallice T
    Neuropsychology; 2011 Nov; 25(6):720-33. PubMed ID: 21728428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An examination of refreshing in between-category sequences.
    Langerock N; Wisniewski D; Brass M; Vergauwe E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):190-201. PubMed ID: 29744894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.