These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24295003)

  • 61. Reproducibility of measurements in tablet-assisted, PC-aided, and manual cephalometric analysis.
    Goracci C; Ferrari M
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 24160993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. New posteroanterior cephalometric norms: a comparison with craniofacial measures of children treated with palatal expansion.
    Huertas D; Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Aug; 71(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 11510637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Facial height in Japanese-Brazilian descendants with normal occlusion.
    Vieira FP; Pinzan A; Janson G; Fernandes TM; Sathler RC; Henriques RP
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):54-66. PubMed ID: 25715717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Do long-faced subjects really have a long anterior face? A longitudinal study.
    Ha Y; Park YS; Lee SP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):799-806. PubMed ID: 24880851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A retrospective comparison of craniofacial form in Northern Irish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Leonard AG; Kneafsey B; McKenna S; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Sep; 35(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 9761558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
    Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Relationship between sella turcica bridging and cephalometric parameters in adolescents and young adults.
    Buyuk SK; Karaman A; Yasa Y
    Oral Radiol; 2019 Sep; 35(3):245-250. PubMed ID: 30484203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Floating norms for the ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 3465233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Late adult skeletofacial growth after adolescent Herbst therapy: a 32-year longitudinal follow-up study.
    Pancherz H; Bjerklin K; Hashemi K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 25533068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology.
    Uchida Y; Motoyoshi M; Shigeeda T; Shinohara A; Igarashi Y; Sakaguchi M; Shimizu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):654-9. PubMed ID: 21262936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with bilateral complete cleft of primary versus secondary palate.
    Liao YF; Huang CS; Noordhoff MS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):353-6. PubMed ID: 12019013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A morphometric analysis of the craniofacial configuration in achondroplasia.
    Cohen MM; Walker GF; Phillips C
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol Suppl; 1985; 1():139-65. PubMed ID: 3877092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Cephalometric superimposition on the cranial base: a review and a comparison of four methods.
    Ghafari J; Engel FE; Laster LL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 May; 91(5):403-13. PubMed ID: 3472459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The relationship of distinct craniofacial features between Turner syndrome females and their parents.
    Perkiömäki MR; Kyrkanides S; Niinimaa A; Alvesalo L
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15743862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Skeletal and soft tissue changes and stability in cleft lip and palate patients after distraction osteogenesis using a new intraoral maxillary device.
    Ansari E; Tomat C; Kadlub N; Diner PA; Bellocq T; Vazquez MP; Picard A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 43(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 25600629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Dimensional variation of craniofacial structures in relation to changing masticatory-functional demands.
    Varrela J
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Feb; 14(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 1563473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 284 healthy North American white children between 1 and 5 years of age.
    Farkas LG; Hreczko TM; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 12544216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Craniofacial morphology in Chinese female twins: a semi-longitudinal cephalometric study.
    Peng J; Deng H; Cao C; Ishikawa M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 16257991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.