BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24295256)

  • 1. Artificial urinary sphincter revision: the role of ultrasound.
    Brucker BM; Demirtas A; Fong E; Kelly C; Nitti VW
    Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1424-8. PubMed ID: 24295256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction?
    Bugeja S; Ivaz SL; Frost A; Andrich DE; Mundy AR
    BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 26384584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy.
    Guralnick ML; Miller E; Toh KL; Webster GD
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079. PubMed ID: 11956443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Causes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Failure and Strategies for Surgical Revision: Implications of Device Component Survival.
    Srivastava A; Joice GA; Patel HD; Manka MG; Sopko NA; Wright EJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):887-893. PubMed ID: 29545058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.
    Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS
    Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28128901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Dysfunctions of artificial urinary sphincters (AMS 800) and their management via a transscrotal access. Optimum procedure illustrated by reference to clinical examples].
    van der Horst C; Naumann CM; Wilson SK; Wefer B; Braun PM; Jünemann KP
    Urologe A; 2007 Dec; 46(12):1704-9. PubMed ID: 17932644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Ohmmeter Identifies the Site of Fluid Leakage during Artificial Urinary Sphincter Revision Surgery.
    Selph JP; Belsante MJ; Gupta S; Ajay D; Lentz A; Webster G; Le NB; Peterson AC
    J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1043-8. PubMed ID: 25988517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proof of concept: Exposing the myth of urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter via assessment of circumferential recovery after capsulotomy and intraoperative pressure profiling of the pressure regulating balloon.
    Pearlman AM; Rasper AM; Terlecki RP
    Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Jul; 59(4):275-279. PubMed ID: 29984343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Management of urethral atrophy after implantation of artificial urinary sphincter: what are the weaknesses?
    Heah NH; Tan RBW
    Asian J Androl; 2020; 22(1):60-63. PubMed ID: 31736473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is Removal of the Pressure-regulating Balloon Necessary After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion?
    Rozanski AT; Viers BR; Shakir NA; Pagliara TJ; Scott JM; Morey AF
    Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():225-229. PubMed ID: 29155193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decreasing need for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery by precise cuff sizing in men with spongiosal atrophy.
    Simhan J; Morey AF; Zhao LC; Tausch TJ; Scott JF; Hudak SJ; Mazzarella BC
    J Urol; 2014 Sep; 192(3):798-803. PubMed ID: 24746880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intentionally retained pressure-regulating balloon in artificial urinary sphincter revision.
    Köhler TS; Benson A; Ost L; Wilson SK; Brant WO
    J Sex Med; 2013 Oct; 10(10):2566-70. PubMed ID: 22974168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter.
    Raj GV; Peterson AC; Toh KL; Webster GD
    J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1242-5. PubMed ID: 15758761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The 51-60 cm H
    Loh-Doyle JC; Markarian E; Boyd SD; Ginsberg D
    Urology; 2024 Jan; 183():221-227. PubMed ID: 37805051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pressure Regulating Balloon Herniation: A Correctable Cause of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Malfunction.
    Khouri RK; Baumgarten AS; Ortiz NM; Ward EE; Baker RC; VanDyke ME; Yi YA; Hudak SJ; Morey AF
    Urology; 2020 May; 139():188-192. PubMed ID: 32057792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of Device-related Complications After Exchange of the Pressure-regulating Balloon in Men With an Artificial Urinary Sphincter.
    Loh-Doyle JC; Nazemi A; Ashrafi A; Doumanian LR; Ginsberg DA; Boyd SD
    Urology; 2020 Jan; 135():154-158. PubMed ID: 31585200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Downsizing Improves Continence and Patient Satisfaction in Cases of Sub-cuff Atrophy.
    Krughoff K; Nosé BD; Peterson AC
    J Urol; 2023 Apr; 209(4):742-751. PubMed ID: 36583650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical failure rates of artificial urinary sphincter components: Is the 3.5-cm urethral cuff at higher risk?
    Loh-Doyle JC; Hartman N; Nazemi A; Wayne K; Doumanian LR; Ginsberg DA; Boyd SD
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Jan; 38(1):187-192. PubMed ID: 30248180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early Revision after Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation Does Not Impair the Long-Term Treatment Success.
    Sayedahmed K; Rosenhammer B; Burger M; Goßler C
    Urol Int; 2022; 106(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 34289484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Revision in Nonneurological Male Patients.
    Bentellis I; El-Akri M; Cornu JN; Brierre T; Cousin T; Gaillard V; Dupuis H; Tricard T; Hermieu N; Bertrand-Leon P; Chevallier D; Bruyere F; Biardeau X; Hermieu JF; Lecoanet P; Capon G; Game X; Saussine C; Durand M; Peyronnet B
    J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1248-1257. PubMed ID: 34184925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.