These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24295534)

  • 1. More than g: selection quality and adverse impact implications of considering second-stratum cognitive abilities.
    Wee S; Newman DA; Joseph DL
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Jul; 99(4):547-63. PubMed ID: 24295534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diversity shrinkage: Cross-validating pareto-optimal weights to enhance diversity via hiring practices.
    Song QC; Wee S; Newman DA
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Dec; 102(12):1636-1657. PubMed ID: 28749149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can I retake it? Exploring subgroup differences and criterion-related validity in promotion retesting.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Morgeson FP; Schleicher DJ; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):941-55. PubMed ID: 21517142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance.
    McCarthy JM; Van Iddekinge CH; Lievens F; Kung MC; Sinar EF; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Sep; 98(5):701-19. PubMed ID: 23937298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multistage selection strategies: simulating the effects on adverse impact and expected performance for various predictor combinations.
    Finch DM; Edwards BD; Wallace JC
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):318-40. PubMed ID: 19271793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment centers versus cognitive ability tests: Challenging the conventional wisdom on criterion-related validity.
    Sackett PR; Shewach OR; Keiser HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Oct; 102(10):1435-1447. PubMed ID: 28530416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. U.S. Air Force pilot selection tests: what is measured and what is predictive?
    Carretta TR; Ree MJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 Mar; 67(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 8775411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive predictors and age-based adverse impact among business executives.
    Klein RM; Dilchert S; Ones DS; Dages KD
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Sep; 100(5):1497-510. PubMed ID: 25822067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part I.
    Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 22000541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Stress Strategy Test in relation to personality traits and cognitive abilities.
    Federmann R; Bäckström M; Goldsmith R
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19674400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adverse impact reduction and job performance optimization via pareto-optimal weighting: A shrinkage formula and regularization technique using machine learning.
    Song QC; Tang C; Newman DA; Wee S
    J Appl Psychol; 2023 Sep; 108(9):1461-1485. PubMed ID: 37036691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generality and specificity in cognitive aging: a volumetric brain analysis.
    Staff RT; Murray AD; Deary IJ; Whalley LJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1433-40. PubMed ID: 16410052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for cognitive ability tests: implications for range restriction corrections in validation research.
    Sackett PR; Ostgaard DJ
    J Appl Psychol; 1994 Oct; 79(5):680-4. PubMed ID: 7989275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between cognitive-ability saturation and subgroup mean differences across predictors of job performance.
    Dahlke JA; Sackett PR
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Oct; 102(10):1403-1420. PubMed ID: 28530415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic architecture of cognitive traits.
    Le Hellard S; Steen VM
    Scand J Psychol; 2014 Jun; 55(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 24605886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personnel selection: looking toward the future--remembering the past.
    Hough LM; Oswald FL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2000; 51():631-64. PubMed ID: 10751983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Creativity and technical innovation: spatial ability's unique role.
    Kell HJ; Lubinski D; Benbow CP; Steiger JH
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1831-6. PubMed ID: 23846718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Educational attainment as a proxy for cognitive ability in selection: effects on levels of cognitive ability and adverse impact.
    Berry CM; Gruys ML; Sackett PR
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):696-705. PubMed ID: 16737365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central role of g in military pilot selection.
    Ree MJ; Carretta TR
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(2):111-23. PubMed ID: 11539292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Campbell JP
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 20919794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.