These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24295725)

  • 1. Personal networks and private forestry in Minnesota.
    Sagor ES; Becker DR
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():145-54. PubMed ID: 24295725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Agent-Based Model of Private Woodland Owner Management Behavior Using Social Interactions, Information Flow, and Peer-To-Peer Networks.
    Huff ES; Leahy JE; Hiebeler D; Weiskittel AR; Noblet CL
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142453. PubMed ID: 26562429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market.
    Kelly EC; Gold GJ; Di Tommaso J
    Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):882-895. PubMed ID: 28836080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coupled ecological-social dynamics in a forested landscape: spatial interactions and information flow.
    Satake A; Leslie HM; Iwasa Y; Levin SA
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jun; 246(4):695-707. PubMed ID: 17376488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of Swedish Forest Owners' Information and Knowledge-Sharing Networks for Decision-Making: Insights for Climate Change Communication and Adaptation.
    André K; Baird J; Gerger Swartling Å; Vulturius G; Plummer R
    Environ Manage; 2017 Jun; 59(6):885-897. PubMed ID: 28275850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Family forest landowners' interest in forest carbon offset programs: focus group findings from the lake States, USA.
    Miller KA; Snyder SA; Kilgore MA; Davenport MA
    Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 54(6):1399-411. PubMed ID: 25148783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-boundary cooperation in a watershed context: the sentiments of private forest landowners.
    Rickenbach MG; Reed AS
    Environ Manage; 2002 Oct; 30(4):584-94. PubMed ID: 12481924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The implications of new forest tenure reforms and forestry property markets for sustainable forest management and forest certification in China.
    Chen J; Innes JL
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():206-15. PubMed ID: 23948439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.
    Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding perceptions of stakeholder groups about Forestry Best Management Practices in Georgia.
    Tumpach C; Dwivedi P; Izlar R; Cook C
    J Environ Manage; 2018 May; 213():374-381. PubMed ID: 29502022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conservation perspectives of small-scale private forest owners in Europe: A systematic review.
    Tiebel M; Mölder A; Plieninger T
    Ambio; 2022 Apr; 51(4):836-848. PubMed ID: 34545552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regulatory Intensity on Private Forestland and its Relationship with State Characteristics in the United States.
    Poudel K; Crandall MS; Kelly EC
    Environ Manage; 2024 Jun; 73(6):1121-1133. PubMed ID: 38710805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk and cooperation: managing hazardous fuel in mixed ownership landscapes.
    Fischer AP; Charnley S
    Environ Manage; 2012 Jun; 49(6):1192-207. PubMed ID: 22525987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The lay of the land: What we know about non-operating agricultural and absentee forest landowners in the U.S. and Europe.
    Fairchild E; Ulrich-Schad JD; Petrzelka P; Ma Z
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 313():114991. PubMed ID: 35367676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Small-scale forestry and carbon offset markets: An empirical study of Vermont Current Use forest landowner willingness to accept carbon credit programs.
    White AE; Lutz DA; Howarth RB; Soto JR
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201967. PubMed ID: 30106977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consider the source: the impact of media and authority in outreach to private forest and rangeland owners.
    Ferranto S; Huntsinger L; Stewart W; Getz C; Nakamura G; Kelly M
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Apr; 97():131-40. PubMed ID: 22266415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Social interactions and resource ownership in two private protected areas of Paraguay.
    Quintana J; Morse S
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Oct; 77(1):64-78. PubMed ID: 15975704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An empirical evaluation of private landowner participation in voluntary forest conservation programs.
    Kauneckis D; York AM
    Environ Manage; 2009 Sep; 44(3):468-84. PubMed ID: 19629580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting private forest landowner interest in ecosystem management: linking spatial and survey data.
    Jacobson MG
    Environ Manage; 2002 Oct; 30(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 12481923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.