800 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24295923)
21. [Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Retrospective and comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy].
Farache C; Alonso S; Ferrer Marsollier C; Masia F; de Tayrac R; Triopon G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 22542372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Surgical approaches in women with endometrial cancer with a body mass index greater than 35 kg/m
Raventós-Tato RM; de la Torre-Fernández de Vega J; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Díaz-Feijoó B; Sabadell J; Pérez-Benavente MA; Gil-Moreno A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Jan; 45(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 30191628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer.
Coronado PJ; Herraiz MA; Magrina JF; Fasero M; Vidart JA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22819573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: A systematic review.
Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Boulus S; Amit A; Lowenstein L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Dec; 231():1-7. PubMed ID: 30317138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches.
Martino MA; Berger EA; McFetridge JT; Shubella J; Gosciniak G; Wejkszner T; Kainz GF; Patriarco J; Thomas MB; Boulay R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 24513969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of Robotic Platforms on Surgical Approach and Costs in the Management of Morbidly Obese Patients with Newly Diagnosed Uterine Cancer.
Leitao MM; Narain WR; Boccamazzo D; Sioulas V; Cassella D; Ducie JA; Eriksson AG; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Brown CL; Levine DA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2192-8. PubMed ID: 26744108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Learning Needs of Women Who Undergo Robotic Versus Open Gynecologic Surgery.
Kurt G; Loerzel VW; Hines RB; Tavasci K; Galura S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2018 Jul; 47(4):490-497. PubMed ID: 29750905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Sinno AK; Fader AN
Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):922-32. PubMed ID: 25274485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review.
Gaia G; Holloway RW; Santoro L; Ahmad S; Di Silverio E; Spinillo A
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 116(6):1422-1431. PubMed ID: 21099613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use?
Fanfani F; Restaino S; Ercoli A; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Gallotta V; Monterossi G; Cappuccio S; Scambia G
Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Aug; 68(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 26633042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.
Sanabria D; Rodriguez J; Pecci P; Ardila E; Pareja R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 31715304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prospective cohort study comparing quality of life and sexual health outcomes between women undergoing robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for endometrial cancer.
Ferguson SE; Panzarella T; Lau S; Gien LT; Samouëlian V; Giede C; Steed H; Le T; Renkosinski B; Bernardini MQ
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):476-483. PubMed ID: 29681461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A prospective comparison of costs between robotics, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in endometrial cancer among women with Class III obesity or higher.
Kosa SD; Ferguson SE; Panzarella T; Lau S; Abitbol J; Samouëlian V; Giede C; Steed H; Renkosinski B; Gien LT; Bernardini MQ
J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(4):747-753. PubMed ID: 34904716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Paraiso MF
Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 25274486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minilaparotomy Versus Laparoscopic Myomectomy After Cessation of Power Morcellation: Rate of Wound Complications.
Dubin AK; Wei J; Sullivan S; Udaltsova N; Zaritsky E; Yamamoto MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):946-953. PubMed ID: 28552622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy in gynecologic oncology: A systematic review of the literature.
Nahas S; Feigenberg T; Park S
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Nov; 143(2):439-442. PubMed ID: 27475523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
Ross JW; Preston MR
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future.
Chen CC; Falcone T
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 52(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 19661749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
