These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24295938)

  • 1. Decade of 'normal' mammography reports--the happygram.
    Cappello NM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):903-8. PubMed ID: 24295938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dense breast legislation in the United States: state of the states.
    Dehkordy SF; Carlos RC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):899-902. PubMed ID: 24295937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The density conundrum: does legislation help or hurt?
    Smith ML
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):909-12. PubMed ID: 24295939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital breast tomosynthesis and the challenges of implementing an emerging breast cancer screening technology into clinical practice.
    Lee CI; Lehman CD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):913-7. PubMed ID: 24295940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dense breast notification: anatomy, imaging, and patient awareness.
    Jones TL; Stevens KK
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 86(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 25224083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dense Breast Legislation in the United States: State of the States.
    Dehkordy SF; Carlos RC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R53-R57. PubMed ID: 27814815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of legislation mandating breast density notification - Review of the evidence.
    Houssami N; Lee CI
    Breast; 2018 Dec; 42():102-112. PubMed ID: 30236594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dense Breast Notification Laws: Impact on Downstream Imaging After Screening Mammography.
    Horný M; Cohen AB; Duszak R; Christiansen CL; Shwartz M; Burgess JF
    Med Care Res Rev; 2020 Apr; 77(2):143-154. PubMed ID: 29347864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast Density Reporting Laws and Supplemental Screening-A Survey of Referring Providers' Experiences and Understanding.
    Maimone S; McDonough MD; Hines SL
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2017; 46(2):105-109. PubMed ID: 27289137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding the response of mammography facilities to breast density notification.
    Henderson LM; Marsh MW; Earnhardt K; Pritchard M; Benefield TS; Agans RP; Lee SS
    Cancer; 2020 Dec; 126(24):5230-5238. PubMed ID: 32926413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should women be informed of breast density?
    Fajardo LL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 23290666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
    Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
    Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast density and breast cancer risk: a practical review.
    Wang AT; Vachon CM; Brandt KR; Ghosh K
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2014 Apr; 89(4):548-57. PubMed ID: 24684876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgeon-read screening mammography: an analysis of 11,948 examinations.
    Apffelstaedt JP; Steenkamp V; Baatjes KJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 3():249-54. PubMed ID: 20853042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ACR system enhances mammography reporting.
    Kopans D; D'Orsi C
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1992 Sep; 14(9):125-32. PubMed ID: 10183943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dense breasts: a review of reporting legislation and available supplemental screening options.
    Ho JM; Jafferjee N; Covarrubias GM; Ghesani M; Handler B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):449-56. PubMed ID: 25055284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening.
    Chiu SY; Duffy S; Yen AM; Tabár L; Smith RA; Chen HH
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 May; 19(5):1219-28. PubMed ID: 20406961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development and implementation of a patient-centered radiology consultation service: a focus on breast density and additional screening options.
    Sullivan CL; Pandya A; Min RJ; Drotman M; Hentel K
    Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(5):731-4. PubMed ID: 25655643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability in mammography screening legislation across the states.
    Fowler BA
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000 Mar; 9(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 10746521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.