178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24296118)
1. Local and systemic risk factors influencing the long-term success of angular stable alloplastic reconstruction plates of the mandible.
Kämmerer PW; Klein MO; Moergel M; Gemmel M; Draenert GF
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e271-6. PubMed ID: 24296118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Plate related complication after mandibular reconstruction].
Liu SP; Cai ZG; Zhang J; Zhang JG; Zhang Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 48(10):586-90. PubMed ID: 24438564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of miniplates and biodegradable plates in reconstruction of the mandible with a fibular free flap.
Kim NK; Nam W; Kim HJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 53(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 25616846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of extended vertical lower trapezius island myocutaneous flaps to cover exposed reconstructive plates.
Fang SL; Wang YY; Chen WL; Zhang DM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):2092.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25234539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of complications after reconstruction of bone defects involving complete mandibular resection using finite element modelling.
Markwardt J; Pfeifer G; Eckelt U; Reitemeier B
Onkologie; 2007 Mar; 30(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 17341898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rigid fixation of vascularized bone grafts in mandibular reconstruction.
Futran ND; Urken ML; Buchbinder D; Moscoso JF; Biller HF
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Jan; 121(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 7803025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scope and limitations of methods of mandibular reconstruction: a long-term follow-up.
Maurer P; Eckert AW; Kriwalsky MS; Schubert J
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 48(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19647911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandibular reconstruction using a titanium plate: the impact of radiation therapy on plate preservation.
Ryu JK; Stern RL; Robinson MG; Bowers MK; Kubo HD; Donald PJ; Rosenthal SA; Fu KK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jun; 32(3):627-34. PubMed ID: 7790248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of plate use for mandibular reconstruction: has changing technology made a difference?
Klotch DW; Gal TJ; Gal RL
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Oct; 121(4):388-92. PubMed ID: 10504593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors involved in long- and short-term mandibular plate exposure.
Nicholson RE; Schuller DE; Forrest LA; Mountain RE; Ali T; Young D
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Feb; 123(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 9046293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Miniplates Versus Reconstruction Bars for Oncologic Free Fibula Flap Mandible Reconstruction.
Al-Bustani S; Austin GK; Ambrose EC; Miller J; Hackman TG; Halvorson EG
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Sep; 77(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 27518036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary mandibular reconstruction: analysis of 64 cases and evaluation of interface radiation dosimetry on bridging plates.
Gullane PJ
Laryngoscope; 1991 Jun; 101(6 Pt 2 Suppl 54):1-24. PubMed ID: 2041453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive factors for premature loss of Martin 2.7 mandibular reconstruction plates.
van der Rijt EE; Noorlag R; Koole R; Abbink JH; Rosenberg AJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb; 53(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 25468318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Segmental Mirroring: Does It Eliminate the Need for Intraoperative Readjustment of the Virtually Pre-Bent Reconstruction Plates and Is It Economically Valuable?
Khalifa GA; Abd El Moniem NA; Elsayed SA; Qadry Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):621-30. PubMed ID: 26519751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MatrixMANDIBLE preformed reconstruction plates--a two-year two-institution experience in 71 patients.
Probst FA; Mast G; Ermer M; Gutwald R; Schmelzeisen R; Pautke C; Otto S; Schiel S; Ehrenfeld M; Cornelius CP; Metzger MC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 70(11):e657-66. PubMed ID: 22868032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A small number of residual teeth after the mandibular resection of oral cancer is associated with titanium reconstruction plate exposure.
Hirohata H; Yanagawa T; Takaoka S; Yamagata K; Sasaki K; Shibuya Y; Uchida F; Fukuzawa S; Tabuchi K; Hasegawa S; Ishibashi-Kanno N; Sekido M; Bukawa H
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Oct; 5(5):469-475. PubMed ID: 31687179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of alloplastic mandibular reconstruction in patients following removal of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Ettl T; Driemel O; Dresp BV; Reichert TE; Reuther J; Pistner H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 38(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 19501515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is immediate reconstruction of the mandible with nonvascularized bone graft following resection of benign pathology a viable treatment option?
Schlieve T; Hull W; Miloro M; Kolokythas A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 73(3):541-9. PubMed ID: 25683044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications associated with rigid fixation of mandibulotomies.
McCann KJ; Irish JC; Gullane PJ; Holmes H; Brown DH; Rotstein L
J Otolaryngol; 1994 Jun; 23(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 8064964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small and large titanium plates are equally effective for treating mandible fractures.
Bouloux GF; Chen S; Threadgill JM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1613-21. PubMed ID: 22698293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
