These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24297291)

  • 1. Understanding clicker discussions: student reasoning and the impact of instructional cues.
    Knight JK; Wise SB; Southard KM
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(4):645-54. PubMed ID: 24297291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Group Random Call Can Positively Affect Student In-Class Clicker Discussions.
    Knight JK; Wise SB; Sieke S
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27856544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cues Matter: Learning Assistants Influence Introductory Biology Student Interactions during Clicker-Question Discussions.
    Knight JK; Wise SB; Rentsch J; Furtak EM
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015; 14(4):ar41. PubMed ID: 26590204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using Pre-Assessment and In-Class Questions to Change Student Understanding of Molecular Movements.
    Shi J; Knight JK; Chun H; Guild NA; Martin JM
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2017 Apr; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 28512521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors Influencing Quality of Team Discussion: Discourse Analysis in an Undergraduate Team-Based Learning Biology Course.
    Leupen SM; Kephart KL; Hodges LC
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2020 Mar; 19(1):ar7. PubMed ID: 32058832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting Clickers: In-Class Questions Followed by At-Home Reflections Are Associated with Higher Student Performance on Related Exam Questions.
    Kirkwood-Watts DL; Bremers EK; Robinson EA; Brazeal KR; Couch BA
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2022 Aug; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 36061330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Student Behaviors and Interactions Influence Group Discussions in an Introductory Biology Lab Setting.
    Paine AR; Knight JK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2020 Dec; 19(4):ar58. PubMed ID: 33259280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Student perception of group dynamics predicts individual performance: Comfort and equity matter.
    Theobald EJ; Eddy SL; Grunspan DZ; Wiggins BL; Crowe AJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181336. PubMed ID: 28727749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Student anxiety in introductory biology classrooms: Perceptions about active learning and persistence in the major.
    England BJ; Brigati JR; Schussler EE
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182506. PubMed ID: 28771564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using clickers to facilitate development of problem-solving skills.
    Levesque AA
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(4):406-17. PubMed ID: 22135374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concepts first, jargon second improves student articulation of understanding.
    McDonnell L; Barker MK; Wieman C
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2016; 44(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 26537537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Higher-Order Clicker Questions Engage Students and Prepare Them for Higher-Order Thinking Activities.
    Anderson DK; Schoenleber M; Korshavn S
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2023 Apr; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 37089235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions.
    Smith MK; Wood WB; Krauter K; Knight JK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 21364100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Campus-Wide Investigation of Clicker Implementation: The Status of Peer Discussion in STEM Classes.
    Lewin JD; Vinson EL; Stetzer MR; Smith MK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(1):ar6. PubMed ID: 26931397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system.
    Gauci SA; Dantas AM; Williams DA; Kemm RE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 19261762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Context dependence of students' views about the role of equations in understanding biology.
    Watkins J; Elby A
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013 Jun; 12(2):274-86. PubMed ID: 23737634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What's in a Name? The Importance of Students Perceiving That an Instructor Knows Their Names in a High-Enrollment Biology Classroom.
    Cooper KM; Haney B; Krieg A; Brownell SE
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 28188281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using online lectures to make time for active learning.
    Prunuske AJ; Batzli J; Howell E; Miller S
    Genetics; 2012 Sep; 192(1):67-72; quiz 1Sl-3SL. PubMed ID: 22714412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does displaying the class results affect student discussion during peer instruction?
    Perez KE; Strauss EA; Downey N; Galbraith A; Jeanne R; Cooper S
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 20516358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Student interpretations of phylogenetic trees in an introductory biology course.
    Dees J; Momsen JL; Niemi J; Montplaisir L
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(4):666-76. PubMed ID: 25452489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.