These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24297964)

  • 1. Retention protocols and use of vacuum-formed retainers among specialist orthodontists.
    Meade MJ; Millett D
    J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 40(4):318-25. PubMed ID: 24297964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention decisions and protocols among orthodontists practicing in Canada: A cross-sectional survey.
    Carneiro NCR; Nóbrega MTC; Meade MJ; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jul; 162(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 35153115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A survey of protocols and trends in orthodontic retention.
    Andriekute A; Vasiliauskas A; Sidlauskas A
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Oct; 18(1):31. PubMed ID: 28990138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months.
    Forde K; Storey M; Littlewood SJ; Scott P; Luther F; Kang J
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):387-398. PubMed ID: 29059289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention practices and factors affecting retainer choice among orthodontists in Saudi Arabia.
    Al-Jewair TS; Hamidaddin MA; Alotaibi HM; Alqahtani ND; Albarakati SF; Alkofide EA; Al-Moammar KA
    Saudi Med J; 2016 Aug; 37(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 27464868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthodontic retention patterns in the United Kingdom.
    Singh P; Grammati S; Kirschen R
    J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 36(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 19487742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures.
    Padmos JAD; Fudalej PS; Renkema AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 29602341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention: type, duration and need for common guidelines. A survey of Norwegian orthodontists.
    Vandevska-Radunovic V; Espeland L; Stenvik A
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e110-7. PubMed ID: 23646321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of retention protocols among members of the American Association of Orthodontists in the United States.
    Pratt MC; Kluemper GT; Hartsfield JK; Fardo D; Nash DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):520-6. PubMed ID: 21967939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.
    Saleh M; Hajeer MY; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 28430890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A survey on retention practice among orthodontists in Malaysia.
    Ab Rahman N; Low TF; Idris NS
    Korean J Orthod; 2016 Jan; 46(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 26877981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vacuum-formed retainers and bonded retainers for dental stabilization-a randomized controlled trial. Part II: patients' perceptions 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment.
    Krämer A; Sjöström M; Hallman M; Feldmann I
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr; 43(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 32613244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States.
    Valiathan M; Hughes E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):170-7; discussion 177. PubMed ID: 20152670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ORTHODONTIST CLINICAL EXPERIENCE AND CLINICAL SITUATION SIGNIFICANTLY INFLUENCE THE RETENTION PROTOCOL - A SURVEY FROM CROATIA.
    Popović Z; Trinajstić Zrinski M; Špalj S
    Acta Clin Croat; 2020 Mar; 59(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 32724269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Stability of the Results of Orthodontic Treatment and Gingival Health between Hawley and Vacuum-formed Retainers.
    Moslemzadeh SH; Sohrabi A; Rafighi A; Farshidnia S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):443-449. PubMed ID: 29728551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost analysis of two types of fixed maxillary retainers and a removable vacuum-formed maxillary retainer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sonesson M; Naraghi S; Bondemark L
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 35021204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient compliance with orthodontic retainers in the postretention phase.
    Pratt MC; Kluemper GT; Lindstrom AF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 21803257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers.
    Hichens L; Rowland H; Williams A; Hollinghurst S; Ewings P; Clark S; Ireland A; Sandy J
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 17702797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which orthodontic retention protocol should I implement? A critical assessment of a randomised controlled trial.
    Steegmans PAJ; Cavagnetto D; Reynders RAM
    Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec; 23(4):162-165. PubMed ID: 36526846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The origin and evolution of the Hawley retainer for the effectiveness to maintain tooth position after fixed orthodontic treatment compare to vacuum-formed retainer: A systematic review of RCTs.
    Outhaisavanh S; Liu Y; Song J
    Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):225-236. PubMed ID: 32201168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.