BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24297964)

  • 1. Retention protocols and use of vacuum-formed retainers among specialist orthodontists.
    Meade MJ; Millett D
    J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 40(4):318-25. PubMed ID: 24297964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention decisions and protocols among orthodontists practicing in Canada: A cross-sectional survey.
    Carneiro NCR; Nóbrega MTC; Meade MJ; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jul; 162(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 35153115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A survey of protocols and trends in orthodontic retention.
    Andriekute A; Vasiliauskas A; Sidlauskas A
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Oct; 18(1):31. PubMed ID: 28990138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months.
    Forde K; Storey M; Littlewood SJ; Scott P; Luther F; Kang J
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):387-398. PubMed ID: 29059289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention practices and factors affecting retainer choice among orthodontists in Saudi Arabia.
    Al-Jewair TS; Hamidaddin MA; Alotaibi HM; Alqahtani ND; Albarakati SF; Alkofide EA; Al-Moammar KA
    Saudi Med J; 2016 Aug; 37(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 27464868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthodontic retention patterns in the United Kingdom.
    Singh P; Grammati S; Kirschen R
    J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 36(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 19487742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures.
    Padmos JAD; Fudalej PS; Renkema AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 29602341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention: type, duration and need for common guidelines. A survey of Norwegian orthodontists.
    Vandevska-Radunovic V; Espeland L; Stenvik A
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e110-7. PubMed ID: 23646321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of retention protocols among members of the American Association of Orthodontists in the United States.
    Pratt MC; Kluemper GT; Hartsfield JK; Fardo D; Nash DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):520-6. PubMed ID: 21967939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.
    Saleh M; Hajeer MY; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 28430890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A survey on retention practice among orthodontists in Malaysia.
    Ab Rahman N; Low TF; Idris NS
    Korean J Orthod; 2016 Jan; 46(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 26877981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vacuum-formed retainers and bonded retainers for dental stabilization-a randomized controlled trial. Part II: patients' perceptions 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment.
    Krämer A; Sjöström M; Hallman M; Feldmann I
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr; 43(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 32613244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States.
    Valiathan M; Hughes E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):170-7; discussion 177. PubMed ID: 20152670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ORTHODONTIST CLINICAL EXPERIENCE AND CLINICAL SITUATION SIGNIFICANTLY INFLUENCE THE RETENTION PROTOCOL - A SURVEY FROM CROATIA.
    Popović Z; Trinajstić Zrinski M; Špalj S
    Acta Clin Croat; 2020 Mar; 59(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 32724269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Stability of the Results of Orthodontic Treatment and Gingival Health between Hawley and Vacuum-formed Retainers.
    Moslemzadeh SH; Sohrabi A; Rafighi A; Farshidnia S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):443-449. PubMed ID: 29728551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost analysis of two types of fixed maxillary retainers and a removable vacuum-formed maxillary retainer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sonesson M; Naraghi S; Bondemark L
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 35021204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient compliance with orthodontic retainers in the postretention phase.
    Pratt MC; Kluemper GT; Lindstrom AF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 21803257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers.
    Hichens L; Rowland H; Williams A; Hollinghurst S; Ewings P; Clark S; Ireland A; Sandy J
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 17702797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which orthodontic retention protocol should I implement? A critical assessment of a randomised controlled trial.
    Steegmans PAJ; Cavagnetto D; Reynders RAM
    Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec; 23(4):162-165. PubMed ID: 36526846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The origin and evolution of the Hawley retainer for the effectiveness to maintain tooth position after fixed orthodontic treatment compare to vacuum-formed retainer: A systematic review of RCTs.
    Outhaisavanh S; Liu Y; Song J
    Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):225-236. PubMed ID: 32201168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.