124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24298285)
1. Quantifying the extruded bacteria following use of two rotary instrumentation systems.
Mohammadi Z; Khademi A
Iran Endod J; 2007; 2(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 24298285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria following use of new rotary instrumentation system.
Mohammadi Z
N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 19548490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An ex vivo quantification of the apically extruded bacteria following use of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
Mohammadi Z
J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):120-2. PubMed ID: 18277742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques.
Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Sümer Z; Er K; Bek B
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19133095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using rotary ProTaper, K3XF, twisted and hand K-file system: An ex vivo study.
Ghogre P; Chourasia HR; Agarwal M; Singh MP; Gurav S; Ghogre R
Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 26481889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria with Single File and Multifile Rotary Instrumentation Systems.
Saberi E; Zahedani SS; Ebrahimipour S
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2017; 7(5):292-296. PubMed ID: 29026702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using K3, Mtwo, RaCe and protaper rotary systems: An in vitro study.
Garlapati R; Venigalla BS; Patil JD; Raju R; Rammohan C
J Conserv Dent; 2013 Jul; 16(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 23956529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using ProTaper Next, Mtwo, and ProTaper rotary systems: An
Polineni S; Damaraju B; Bolla N; Sunil C; Krishna NV; Sreeha K
J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(3):314-318. PubMed ID: 33551607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria following use of Two Engine-driven Instrumentation Techniques: An in vitro Study.
Mohammed N; Noushad MC; Balan B; Dhanesh N; Jayasheelan N; Revankar VD
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):939-942. PubMed ID: 27965505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of apical bacterial extrusion following root canal instrumentation using different endodontic file systems: An
Vankayala B; Anantula K; Saladi H; Gudugunta L; Basavarajaiah JM; Yadav SS
J Conserv Dent; 2019; 22(6):559-563. PubMed ID: 33088065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apical extrusion of bacteria when using reciprocating single-file and rotary multifile instrumentation systems.
Tinoco JM; De-Deus G; Tinoco EM; Saavedra F; Fidel RA; Sassone LM
Int Endod J; 2014 Jun; 47(6):560-6. PubMed ID: 24111671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
Reddy SA; Hicks ML
J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using hand and three rotary instrumentation systems − An in vitro study.
Madhusudhana K; Mathew VB; Reddy NM
Contemp Clin Dent; 2010 Oct; 1(4):234-6. PubMed ID: 22114427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of various endodontic instrumentation systems on the amount of apically extruded bacteria - An
Sahni G; Garg N; Chhabra A; Negi S; Gupta S; Chhabra V
J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(3):270-274. PubMed ID: 33551598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of apically extruded bacteria associated with different nickel-titanium systems.
Türker SA; Uzunoğlu E; Aslan MH
J Endod; 2015 Jun; 41(6):953-5. PubMed ID: 25799537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
Ferraz CC; Gomes NV; Gomes BP; Zaia AA; Teixeira FB; Souza-Filho FJ
Int Endod J; 2001 Jul; 34(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 11482718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
Logani A; Shah N
Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 18797091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of working length and apical preparation size on apical bacterial extrusion during reciprocating instrumentation.
Teixeira JM; Cunha FM; Jesus RO; Silva EJ; Fidel SR; Sassone LM
Int Endod J; 2015 Jul; 48(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 25087922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of conventional, protaper hand and protaper rotary instrumentation system for apical extrusion of debris, irrigants and bacteria- An
Kalra P; Rao A; Suman E; Shenoy R; Suprabha BS
J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Feb; 9(2):e254-e258. PubMed ID: 28210445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
