197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24299193)
1. Differential effects of temporal regularity on auditory-evoked response amplitude: a decrease in silence and increase in noise.
Okamoto H; Teismann H; Keceli S; Pantev C; Kakigi R
Behav Brain Funct; 2013 Dec; 9():44. PubMed ID: 24299193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory cortex tracks the temporal regularity of sustained noisy sounds.
Lütkenhöner B; Seither-Preisler A; Krumbholz K; Patterson RD
Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 272(1-2):85-94. PubMed ID: 21073933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tracing the neural basis of auditory entrainment.
Lehmann A; Arias DJ; Schönwiesner M
Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 337():306-314. PubMed ID: 27667358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Involuntary monitoring of sound signals in noise is reflected in the human auditory evoked N1m response.
Lagemann L; Okamoto H; Teismann H; Pantev C
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31634. PubMed ID: 22389671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory temporal processing in healthy aging: a magnetoencephalographic study.
Sörös P; Teismann IK; Manemann E; Lütkenhöner B
BMC Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 10():34. PubMed ID: 19351410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceptual categorization of sound spectral envelopes reflected in auditory-evoked N1m.
Mizuochi T; Yumoto M; Karino S; Itoh K; Yamakawa K; Kaga K
Neuroreport; 2005 Apr; 16(6):555-8. PubMed ID: 15812306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory sustained field responses to periodic noise.
Keceli S; Inui K; Okamoto H; Otsuru N; Kakigi R
BMC Neurosci; 2012 Jan; 13():7. PubMed ID: 22221469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Encoding of frequency-modulation (FM) rates in human auditory cortex.
Okamoto H; Kakigi R
Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():18143. PubMed ID: 26656920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sound processing hierarchy within human auditory cortex.
Okamoto H; Stracke H; Bermudez P; Pantev C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 23(8):1855-63. PubMed ID: 20521859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The dependence of the auditory evoked N1m decrement on the bandwidth of preceding notch-filtered noise.
Okamoto H; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Kubo T; Pantev C
Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Apr; 21(7):1957-61. PubMed ID: 15869488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attention improves population-level frequency tuning in human auditory cortex.
Okamoto H; Stracke H; Wolters CH; Schmael F; Pantev C
J Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 27(39):10383-90. PubMed ID: 17898210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural adaptation to silence in the human auditory cortex: a magnetoencephalographic study.
Okamoto H; Kakigi R
Brain Behav; 2014; 4(6):858-66. PubMed ID: 25365810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory detection of motion velocity in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study.
Xiang J; Daniel SJ; Ishii R; Holowka S; Harrison RV; Chuang S
Brain Topogr; 2005; 17(3):139-49. PubMed ID: 15974473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory temporal edge detection in human auditory cortex.
Chait M; Poeppel D; Simon JZ
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1213():78-90. PubMed ID: 18455707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neural generators underlying concurrent sound segregation.
Arnott SR; Bardouille T; Ross B; Alain C
Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():116-24. PubMed ID: 21362407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory evoked responses in human auditory cortex to the variation of sound intensity in an ongoing tone.
Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
Hear Res; 2012 May; 287(1-2):67-75. PubMed ID: 22726618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bottom-up driven involuntary auditory evoked field change: constant sound sequencing amplifies but does not sharpen neural activity.
Okamoto H; Stracke H; Lagemann L; Pantev C
J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 103(1):244-9. PubMed ID: 19889852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-stage processing of sounds explains behavioral performance variations due to changes in stimulus contrast and selective attention: an MEG study.
Kauramäki J; Jääskeläinen IP; Hänninen JL; Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Lampinen J; Sams M
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46872. PubMed ID: 23071654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bottom-up driven involuntary attention modulates auditory signal in noise processing.
Lagemann L; Okamoto H; Teismann H; Pantev C
BMC Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 11():156. PubMed ID: 21192798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
