These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24299598)

  • 1. The Relationship between Carotid Artery Diameter and Percentage of Stenosis.
    Chao AC; Chu WF; Mu Huo Teng M; Sun YC; Chang FC; Luo CB
    Neuroradiol J; 2007 Feb; 20(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 24299598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical value of methods to measure carotid stenosis.
    Bladin CF; Alexandrova NA; Murphy J; Alexandrov AV; Maggisano R; Norris JW
    Int Angiol; 1996 Dec; 15(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 9127768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
    De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?
    Lal BK; Hobson RW; Goldstein J; Chakhtoura EY; Durán WN
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Jan; 39(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 14718815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting the normal dimensions of the internal and external carotid arteries from the diameter of the common carotid.
    Williams MA; Nicolaides AN
    Eur J Vasc Surg; 1987 Apr; 1(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 3503020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography.
    Marks MP; Napel S; Jordan JE; Enzmann DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 8498231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.
    Lal BK; Hobson RW; Tofighi B; Kapadia I; Cuadra S; Jamil Z
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 47(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 18178455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum stenosis of extracranial internal carotid artery: effect of luminal morphology on stenosis measurement by using CT angiography and conventional DSA.
    Hirai T; Korogi Y; Ono K; Murata Y; Takahashi M; Suginohara K; Uemura S
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):802-9. PubMed ID: 11719682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stenosis of the internal carotid artery: assessment using color Doppler imaging compared with angiography.
    Erickson SJ; Mewissen MW; Foley WD; Lawson TL; Middleton WD; Quiroz FA; Macrander SJ; Lipchik EO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Jun; 152(6):1299-305. PubMed ID: 2655393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Spontaneous intracranial internal carotid artery dissection: 6 case reports and a review of 39 cases in the literature].
    Nagumo K; Nakamori A; Kojima S
    Rinsho Shinkeigaku; 2003 Jun; 43(6):313-21. PubMed ID: 14503348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of MR angiography, color Doppler sonography, and arteriography.
    Polak JF; Bajakian RL; O'Leary DH; Anderson MR; Donaldson MC; Jolesz FA
    Radiology; 1992 Jan; 182(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 1727306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of extracranial carotid stenosis on intracranial blood flow.
    Shakur SF; Hrbac T; Alaraj A; Du X; Aletich VA; Charbel FT; Amin-Hanjani S
    Stroke; 2014 Nov; 45(11):3427-9. PubMed ID: 25228258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
    Bozzao A; Floris R; Villani A; Varrucciu V; Baviera ME; Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Internal carotid arterial stenosis: CT angiography with volume rendering.
    Leclerc X; Godefroy O; Lucas C; Benhaim JF; Michel TS; Leys D; Pruvo JP
    Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 10207466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Angiographic quantification of stenoses of the internal carotid artery].
    Bartylla K; Huber G
    Radiologe; 1995 Nov; 35(11):801-7. PubMed ID: 8657881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Follow-up of stented carotid arteries by Doppler ultrasound.
    Ringer AJ; German JW; Guterman LR; Hopkins LN
    Neurosurgery; 2002 Sep; 51(3):639-43; discussion 643. PubMed ID: 12188941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical applicability of methods to measure carotid stenosis.
    Alexandrov AV; Bladin CF; Murphy J; Hamilton P; Maggisano R
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 1994; 4(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 26486248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. B-mode estimate of carotid stenosis: planimetric measurements complement the velocity estimate of internal carotid stenosis.
    Bekelis K; Labropoulos N; Pappas P; Gasparis A
    Int Angiol; 2013 Oct; 32(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 23903310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement.
    van Prehn J; Muhs BE; Pramanik B; Ollenschleger M; Rockman CB; Cayne NS; Adelman MA; Jacobowitz GR; Maldonado TS
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 36(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 18585935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The original caliber of the carotid artery as a possible risk factor for complications of atherosclerosis.
    Macchi C; Catini C; Giannelli F
    Ital J Anat Embryol; 1993; 98(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 8018017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.