These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24301094)

  • 1. Influence of early pregnancy on reproductive rate in lines of mice selected for litter size.
    Eisen EJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 1980 Sep; 57(5):209-20. PubMed ID: 24301094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NTP technical report on the toxicity studies of Dibutyl Phthalate (CAS No. 84-74-2) Administered in Feed to F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice.
    Marsman D
    Toxic Rep Ser; 1995 Apr; 30():1-G5. PubMed ID: 12209194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of concurrent lactation and postpartum mating on reproductive performance in mice selected for large litter size.
    Eisen EJ; Saxton AM
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Nov; 59(5):1224-38. PubMed ID: 6511693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic and maternal environmental factors influencing litter size and reproductive efficiency in mice.
    Eisen EJ; Durrant BS
    J Anim Sci; 1980 Mar; 50(3):428-41. PubMed ID: 7364679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postpartum performance in a diallel cross among lines of mice selected for litter size and body weight.
    Eisen EJ; Hörstgen-Schwark G; Bandy TR; Saxton AM
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Apr; 58(4):863-77. PubMed ID: 6725149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproductive performance in a diallel cross among lines of mice selected for litter size and body weight.
    Hörstgen-Schwark G; Eisen EJ; Saxton AM; Bandy TR
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Apr; 58(4):846-62. PubMed ID: 6539325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Postnatal litter size effects on growth and reproduction in rats.
    Azzam SM; Nielsen MK; Dickerson GE
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Jun; 58(6):1337-42. PubMed ID: 6540258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lifetime reproductive performance and survival analysis of mice divergently selected for heat loss.
    Bhatnagar AS; Nielsen MK
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Feb; 92(2):477-84. PubMed ID: 24664557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct and maternal genetic differences between lines of mice selected for body weight and litter size: traits of dams.
    Bandy TR; Eisen EJ
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Sep; 59(3):630-42. PubMed ID: 6541645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multigenerational reproductive study of genistein (Cas No. 446-72-0) in Sprague-Dawley rats (feed study).
    National Toxicology Program
    Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2008 Mar; (539):1-266. PubMed ID: 18685713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of six maternal genetic lines for female productivity measures over four parities.
    Moeller SJ; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Mabry JW; Baas TJ; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jan; 82(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 14753347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of birth litter size, birth parity number, growth rate, backfat thickness and age at first mating of gilts on their reproductive performance as sows.
    Tummaruk P; Lundeheim N; Einarsson S; Dalin AM
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2001 May; 66(3-4):225-37. PubMed ID: 11348784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-trait and antagonistic index selection for litter size and body weight in mice.
    Eisen EJ
    Genetics; 1978 Apr; 88(4):781-811. PubMed ID: 17248819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in pup birth weight, pup variability within litters, and dam weight of mice selected for alternative criteria to increase litter size.
    van Engelen MA; Nielsen MK; Ribeiro EL
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Jul; 73(7):1948-53. PubMed ID: 7592078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sows in mid parity are best foster mothers for the pre- and post-weaning performance of both light and heavy piglets1.
    Huting AMS; Sakkas P; Kyriazakis I
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1656-1670. PubMed ID: 30753520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two different feeding levels during late gestation in gilts and sows under commercial conditions: impact on piglet birth weight and female reproductive performance.
    Mallmann AL; Betiolo FB; Camilloti E; Mellagi APG; Ulguim RR; Wentz I; Bernardi ML; Gonçalves MAD; Kummer R; Bortolozzo FP
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4209-4219. PubMed ID: 30169599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection for uterine capacity improves lifetime productivity of sows.
    Freking BA; Lents CA; Vallet JL
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Apr; 167():16-21. PubMed ID: 26869209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of litter size before weaning on subsequent body development, feed intake, and reproductive performance of young rabbit does.
    Rommers JM; Kemp B; Meijerhof R; Noordhuizen JP
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Aug; 79(8):1973-82. PubMed ID: 11518206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlated responses in maternal performance following divergent selection for heat loss in mice.
    McDonald JM; Nielsen MK
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Feb; 84(2):300-4. PubMed ID: 16424256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.