These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2430308)

  • 21. Correlation of the Bayley scales of infant-toddler development-3rd edition and neuro-sensory motor assessment in preterm infants during the first year of life.
    Kaya-Kara Ö; Kerem-Günel M; Yiğit Ş
    Turk J Pediatr; 2019; 61(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 31916718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scores of typically developing children on the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales: infancy to preschool.
    Darrah J; Magill-Evans J; Volden J; Hodge M; Kembhavi G
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2007; 27(3):5-19. PubMed ID: 17613453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predictive and concurrent validity of standardized neurodevelopmental examinations by the Griffiths scales and Bayley scales of infant development II.
    Chaudhary T; Walch E; Herold B; Metze B; Lejeune A; Burkhardt F; Bührer C
    Klin Padiatr; 2013 Jan; 225(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 23235928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Children born extremely preterm show significant lower cognitive, language and motor function levels compared with children born at term, as measured by the Bayley-III at 2.5 years.
    Månsson J; Stjernqvist K
    Acta Paediatr; 2014 May; 103(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 24494838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Brief assessment of motor function: reliability and concurrent validity of the Gross Motor Scale.
    Cintas HL; Siegel KL; Furst GP; Gerber LH
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Jan; 82(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 12510183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bayley-III motor scale and neurological examination at 2 years do not predict motor skills at 4.5 years.
    Burakevych N; Mckinlay CJ; Alsweiler JM; Wouldes TA; Harding JE;
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2017 Feb; 59(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 27543144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Longitudinal motor development of "apparently normal" high-risk infants at 18 months, 3 and 5 years.
    Goyen TA; Lui K
    Early Hum Dev; 2002 Dec; 70(1-2):103-15. PubMed ID: 12441208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of the performance of healthy Australian 3-year-olds with the standardised norms of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version-III).
    Chinta S; Walker K; Halliday R; Loughran-Fowlds A; Badawi N
    Arch Dis Child; 2014 Jul; 99(7):621-4. PubMed ID: 24504506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Concurrent and predictive validity of the Motor Functional Development Scale for Young Children in preterm infants.
    Legros L; Zaczek S; Vaivre-Douret L; Mostaert A
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Dec; 151():105240. PubMed ID: 33160163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of parent-reported ages and stages questionnaire in assessing the motor and language skills of preterm infants.
    Hwarng GYH; Ereno IL; Ho SKY; Allen JC; Moorakonda RB; Yeo CL
    J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2021; 14(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 32894254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Commentary on "Concurrent validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2".
    OʼShea R; Boyniewicz K
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2012; 24(4):352. PubMed ID: 22965210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of chronological and adjusted ages to compare motor development of healthy preterm and fullterm infants.
    Palisano RJ
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 1986 Apr; 28(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 3709986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Concurrent validity of the Early Intervention Developmental Profile and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2.
    Maring JR; Elbaum L
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2007; 19(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 17505288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Griffiths-II and Bayley-II tests for the developmental assessment of high-risk infants.
    Cirelli I; Bickle Graz M; Tolsa JF
    Infant Behav Dev; 2015 Nov; 41():17-25. PubMed ID: 26276119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Commentary on "Concurrent validity of the TIMP and the Bayley III scales at 6 weeks corrected age".
    Choi K; Ordorica J
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2013; 25(4):401. PubMed ID: 24081012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stability of the Bayley II Scales of Infant Development in a sample of low-risk and high-risk infants.
    Harris SR; Megens AM; Backman CL; Hayes VE
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2005 Dec; 47(12):820-3. PubMed ID: 16288672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - 3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants.
    Yu YT; Hsieh WS; Hsu CH; Chen LC; Lee WT; Chiu NC; Wu YC; Jeng SF
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Nov; 34(11):3875-83. PubMed ID: 24029804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differentiating developmental outcome between infants with severe disability in research studies: the role of Bayley Developmental Quotients.
    Jary S; Kmita G; Whitelaw A
    J Pediatr; 2011 Aug; 159(2):211-4.e1. PubMed ID: 21392784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales - Second Edition (PDMS-2): Reliability, content and construct validity evidence for Brazilian children.
    Zanella LW; Valentini NC; Copetti F; Nobre GC
    Res Dev Disabil; 2021 Apr; 111():103871. PubMed ID: 33571789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Overestimating neurodevelopment using the Bayley-III after early complex cardiac surgery.
    Acton BV; Biggs WS; Creighton DE; Penner KA; Switzer HN; Thomas JH; Joffe AR; Robertson CM
    Pediatrics; 2011 Oct; 128(4):e794-800. PubMed ID: 21949148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.