These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24304909)

  • 21. Effectiveness of the Lidcombe Program for early stuttering in Australian community clinics.
    O'Brian S; Iverach L; Jones M; Onslow M; Packman A; Menzies R
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2013 Dec; 15(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 23691980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of measurement method and transcript availability on inexperienced raters' stuttering frequency scores.
    Chakraborty N; Logan KJ
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 74():23-34. PubMed ID: 29738875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A controlled clinical trial for stuttering in persons aged 9 to 14 years.
    Craig A; Hancock K; Chang E; McCready C; Shepley A; McCaul A; Costello D; Harding S; Kehren R; Masel C; Reilly K
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Aug; 39(4):808-26. PubMed ID: 8844560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measuring Stuttering in Preschool-Aged Children across Different Languages: An International Study.
    Bosshardt HG; Packman A; Blomgren M; Kretschmann J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2015; 67(5):221-30. PubMed ID: 26845773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Self-modelling as a relapse intervention following speech-restructuring treatment for stuttering.
    Cream A; O'Brian S; Onslow M; Packman A; Menzies R
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):587-99. PubMed ID: 19925353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement of trained speech patterns in stuttering: interjudge and intrajudge agreement of experts by means of modified time-interval analysis.
    Alpermann A; Huber W; Natke U; Willmes K
    J Fluency Disord; 2010 Sep; 35(3):299-313. PubMed ID: 20831973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of self-disclosure on the communicative interaction between a person who stutters and a normally fluent speaker.
    Mancinelli JM
    J Fluency Disord; 2019 Mar; 59():1-20. PubMed ID: 30500438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intrajudge and Interjudge Reliability of the Stuttering Severity Instrument-Fourth Edition.
    Davidow JH; Scott KA
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2017 Nov; 26(4):1105-1119. PubMed ID: 28841724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of language familiarity in bilingual stuttering assessment.
    Lee AS; Robb MP; Ormond T; Blomgren M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2014 Oct; 28(10):723-40. PubMed ID: 24588470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors affecting occupational advice for speakers who do and do not stutter.
    Logan KJ; O'Connor EM
    J Fluency Disord; 2012 Mar; 37(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 22325920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Camperdown Program for adults who stutter: a student training clinic Phase I trial.
    Cocomazzo N; Block S; Carey B; O'Brian S; Onslow M; Packman A; Iverach L
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 22788223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A clinical training model for students: intensive treatment of stuttering using prolonged speech.
    Georgieva D; Stoilova R
    Codas; 2018 Oct; 30(5):e20170259. PubMed ID: 30365650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Scores on Riley's stuttering severity instrument versions three and four for samples of different length and for different types of speech material.
    Todd H; Mirawdeli A; Costelloe S; Cavenagh P; Davis S; Howell P
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2014 Dec; 28(12):912-26. PubMed ID: 24938354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing judgments of stuttering made by students, clinicians, and highly experienced judges.
    Brundage SB; Bothe AK; Lengeling AN; Evans JJ
    J Fluency Disord; 2006; 31(4):271-83. PubMed ID: 16982086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical versus laboratory ratings of voice using the CAPE-V.
    Solomon NP; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):e7-14. PubMed ID: 20430573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identifying the authoritative judgments of stuttering: comparisons of self-judgments and observer judgments.
    Ingham RJ; Cordes AK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 40(3):581-94. PubMed ID: 9210116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The duration component of the stress effect in stuttering.
    Natke U; Grosser J; Sandrieser P; Kalveram KT
    J Fluency Disord; 2002; 27(4):305-17; quiz 318. PubMed ID: 12506448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gaze aversion to stuttered speech: a pilot study investigating differential visual attention to stuttered and fluent speech.
    Bowers AL; Crawcour SC; Saltuklaroglu T; Kalinowski J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2010; 45(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 22748027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A phase II trial of the Westmead Program: syllable-timed speech treatment for pre-school children who stutter.
    Trajkovski N; Andrews C; Onslow M; O'Brian S; Packman A; Menzies R
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):500-9. PubMed ID: 22070727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Levels of Speech Usage rating scale: comparison of client self-ratings with speech pathologist ratings.
    Gray C; Baylor C; Eadie T; Kendall D; Yorkston K
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(3):333-44. PubMed ID: 22512518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.