These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24306982)

  • 1. Searching the same display twice: Properties of short-term memory in repeated search.
    Höfler M; Gilchrist ID; Körner C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):335-52. PubMed ID: 24306982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidance toward and away from distractors in repeated visual search.
    Höfler M; Gilchrist ID; Körner C
    J Vis; 2015; 15(5):12. PubMed ID: 26067530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implicit short- and long-term memory direct our gaze in visual search.
    Kruijne W; Meeter M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):761-73. PubMed ID: 26754811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One visual search, many memory searches: An eye-tracking investigation of hybrid search.
    Drew T; Boettcher SEP; Wolfe JM
    J Vis; 2017 Sep; 17(11):5. PubMed ID: 28892812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual consciousness and intertrial feature priming.
    Peremen Z; Hilo R; Lamy D
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23547103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is masked priming modulated by memory load? A test of the automaticity of masked identity priming in lexical decision.
    Perea M; Marcet A; Lozano M; Gomez P
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1127-1135. PubMed ID: 29845591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for distinct mechanisms underlying attentional priming and sensory memory for bistable perception.
    Brinkhuis MA; Kristjánsson Á; Brascamp JW
    J Vis; 2015 Aug; 15(11):8. PubMed ID: 26270190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?
    Rajsic J; Woodman GF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):269-279. PubMed ID: 30937674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repetition blindness in priming in perceptual identification: Competitive effects of a word intervening between prime and target.
    Burt JS; Jolley J
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Oct; 45(7):1171-1181. PubMed ID: 28646419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using a model of hypothesis generation to predict eye movements in a visual search task.
    Buttaccio DR; Lange ND; Thomas RP; Dougherty MR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):247-65. PubMed ID: 25231358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The fate of distractors in working memory: No evidence for their active removal.
    Dagry I; Barrouillet P
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():129-138. PubMed ID: 28886408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The boundary conditions of priming of visual search: from passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load.
    Kristjánsson A; Saevarsson S; Driver J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):514-21. PubMed ID: 23325704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Working memory representations persist in the face of unexpected task alterations.
    Swan G; Wyble B; Chen H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1408-1414. PubMed ID: 28386882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working memory is corrupted by strategic changes in search templates.
    Kong G; Meehan J; Fougnie D
    J Vis; 2020 Aug; 20(8):3. PubMed ID: 32744619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finding memory in search: the effect of visual working memory load on visual search.
    Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1457-66. PubMed ID: 20603775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Independence of long-term contextual memory and short-term perceptual hypotheses: Evidence from contextual cueing of interrupted search.
    Schlagbauer B; Mink M; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):508-521. PubMed ID: 27921267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
    Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference.
    Makovski T; Pertzov Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1735-43. PubMed ID: 25980784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.