139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24307930)
21. Characterization of imaging performance in differential phase contrast CT compared with the conventional CT: spectrum of noise equivalent quanta NEQ(k).
Tang X; Yang Y; Tang S
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4467-82. PubMed ID: 22830779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Xenon-enhanced dual-energy tomosynthesis for functional imaging of respiratory disease-Concept and phantom study.
Tanguay J; Basharat F
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):719-736. PubMed ID: 36419344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of human and Hotelling observer performance for a fan-beam CT signal detection task.
Sanchez AA; Sidky EY; Reiser I; Pan X
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031104. PubMed ID: 23464284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Foveated Model Observers to predict human performance in 3D images.
Lago MA; Abbey CK; Eckstein MP
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2017 Feb; 10136():. PubMed ID: 29176921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimization of contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Analysis using a cascaded linear system model.
Hu YH; Scaduto DA; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 28044312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development, validation, and relevance of in vivo low-contrast task transfer function to estimate detectability in clinical CT images.
Smith TB; Abadi E; Solomon J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):7698-7711. PubMed ID: 34713908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of human observer performance on lesion detectability in single-slice and multislice dedicated breast cone beam CT images with breast anatomical background.
Han M; Jang H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5385-5396. PubMed ID: 30273955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A mobile isocentric C-arm for intraoperative cone-beam CT: Technical assessment of dose and 3D imaging performance.
Sheth NM; De Silva T; Uneri A; Ketcha M; Han R; Vijayan R; Osgood GM; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):958-974. PubMed ID: 31863480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Modified ideal observer model (MIOM) for high-contrast and high-spatial resolution CT imaging tasks.
Cruz-Bastida JP; Gomez-Cardona D; Garrett J; Szczykutowicz T; Chen GH; Li K
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4496-4505. PubMed ID: 28600849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual-energy imaging.
Richard S; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):586-601. PubMed ID: 18383680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Human and model observer performance for lesion detection in breast cone beam CT images with the FDK reconstruction.
Han M; Kim B; Baek J
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194408. PubMed ID: 29543868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Modeling and evaluation of a high-resolution CMOS detector for cone-beam CT of the extremities.
Cao Q; Sisniega A; Brehler M; Stayman JW; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH; Zbijewski W
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):114-130. PubMed ID: 29095489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimization of dual-energy imaging systems using generalized NEQ and imaging task.
Richard S; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):127-39. PubMed ID: 17278498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High frequency residues: A new set of signals for detectability studies of an X-ray imaging system.
González-López A
Phys Med; 2021 Nov; 91():54-61. PubMed ID: 34710791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Noise aliasing and the 3D NEQ of flat-panel cone-beam CT: effect of 2D/3D apertures and sampling.
Tward DJ; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3830-43. PubMed ID: 19746816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Efficiency of the Human Observer Compared to an Ideal Observer Based on a Generalized NEQ Which Incorporates Scatter and Geometric Unsharpness: Evaluation with a 2AFC Experiment.
Kyprianou IS; Ganguly A; Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Gallas BD; Myers KJ
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2005; 5749():251-262. PubMed ID: 21311735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. NPWE model observer as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis of digital detectors in general radiography.
Van Peteghem N; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N575-N591. PubMed ID: 27754987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam CT: evaluation by 2AFC tests in relation to physical performance metrics.
Tward DJ; Siewerdsen JH; Daly MJ; Richard S; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA; Paul NS
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4459-71. PubMed ID: 18072510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. CT automated exposure control using a generalized detectability index.
Khobragade P; Rupcich F; Fan J; Crotty DJ; Kulkarni NM; O'Connor SD; Foley WD; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):140-151. PubMed ID: 30417403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fundamental relationship between the noise properties of grating-based differential phase contrast CT and absorption CT: theoretical framework using a cascaded system model and experimental validation.
Li K; Bevins N; Zambelli J; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021908. PubMed ID: 23387756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
