These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24309030)

  • 1. [Ultrasound screening and diagnostic ultrasound: should we revise the classification of examinations?].
    Simon EG; Arthuis CJ; Perruche K; Perrotin F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24309030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [How many ultrasound examinations for low-risk pregnancies monitoring?].
    Simon EG; Perruche K; Arthuis CJ; Denais V; Perrotin F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Jan; 42(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 24394326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trends in prenatal ultrasound use in the United States: 1995 to 2006.
    Siddique J; Lauderdale DS; VanderWeele TJ; Lantos JD
    Med Care; 2009 Nov; 47(11):1129-35. PubMed ID: 19786915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Fusion imaging, a modern symbol of collaboration between obstetricians and radiologists].
    Quarello E; Bessis R; Devred P; Gorincour G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 May; 42(5):293-5. PubMed ID: 24787609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. N° 260-Échographie et grossesse gémellaire.
    Morin L; Lim K
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Oct; 39(10):e436-e452. PubMed ID: 28935067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Report of the French "conférence nationale de l'échographie obstétricale et fœtale" (CNEOF)-- recommendations for focused prenatal ultrasound].
    Viossat P; Dommergues M; Lansac J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Jun; 43(6):469-71. PubMed ID: 25982782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Not Available].
    Gysel W; Villabruna K
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2017 Jun; 106(12):665-668. PubMed ID: 28609233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Doppler ultrasound in obstetric practice: 2.
    Beattie RB
    Br J Hosp Med; 1994 Jan 19-Feb 1; 51(1-2):34-9. PubMed ID: 8826041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. N
    Nevo O; Brown R; Glanc P; Lim K
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Dec; 39(12):1212-1220. PubMed ID: 29197488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [First trimester ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies--classics and novelties].
    Markov D
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2009; 48 Suppl 2():3-12. PubMed ID: 20380089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pregnancy outcome among non-participants in a trial on ultrasound screening.
    Kieler H; Hellberg D; Nilsson S; Waldenström U; Axelsson O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb; 11(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 9549836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects on maternal anxiety of two-dimensional versus two- plus three-/four-dimensional ultrasound in pregnancies at risk of fetal abnormalities: A randomized study.
    Leung KY; Ngai CS; Lee A; Chan HY; Leung WC; Lee CP; Tang MH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 16909403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The French National Committee on Obstetrical and Fetal Ultrasound guidelines 2022 (CNEOF)].
    Conférence nationale de l’échographie obstétricale et fœtale
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2023 Apr; 51(4):221-226. PubMed ID: 36649816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modifying risk for aneuploidy with second-trimester ultrasound after a positive serum screen.
    Timms D; Campbell WA
    Clin Lab Med; 2010 Sep; 30(3):677-92. PubMed ID: 20638581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The drawing of ultrasound scan, an indicator of the quality of maternal representations].
    Perelman O; Bydlowski S; Missonnier S
    Soins Pediatr Pueric; 2019; 40(308):24-26. PubMed ID: 31171295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [3-dimensional ultrasound].
    Merz E
    Ultraschall Med; 1997 Oct; 18(5):189. PubMed ID: 9441384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group.
    Ewigman BG; Crane JP; Frigoletto FD; LeFevre ML; Bain RP; McNellis D
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Sep; 329(12):821-7. PubMed ID: 8355740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why (not) do obstetric ultrasound? An observation on uncertainty.
    Reed KL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 8(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 8843608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychological factors and ultrasound: differences between routine and high-risk scans.
    Ayers S; Pickering AD
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Feb; 9(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 9132259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The development of obstetric ultrasound in Switzerland].
    Zimmermann R
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2005 Apr; 45(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 15818049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.