These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24309171)

  • 1. The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: A between-subjects experimental survey.
    Scheffels J; Lund I
    BMJ Open; 2013 Dec; 3(12):e003732. PubMed ID: 24309171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The potential impact of plain packaging of cigarette products among Brazilian young women: an experimental study.
    White CM; Hammond D; Thrasher JF; Fong GT
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Sep; 12():737. PubMed ID: 22943135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of cigarette branding and plain packaging on female youth in the United Kingdom.
    Hammond D; Daniel S; White CM
    J Adolesc Health; 2013 Feb; 52(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 23332478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptions of branded and plain cigarette packaging among Mexican youth.
    Mutti S; Hammond D; Reid JL; White CM; Thrasher JF
    Health Promot Int; 2017 Aug; 32(4):650-659. PubMed ID: 26826368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cigarette flavors, package shape, and cigarette brand perceptions: an experiment among young Brazilian women.
    Islam F; Thrasher JF; Szklo A; Figueiredo VC; Perez CA; White CM; Hammond D
    Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2018; 42():e5. PubMed ID: 31093036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deadly in pink: the impact of cigarette packaging among young women.
    Doxey J; Hammond D
    Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 21478476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptions of plain packaging and health warning labels for cannabis among young adults: findings from an experimental study.
    Mutti-Packer S; Collyer B; Hodgins DC
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1361. PubMed ID: 30526539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the United States.
    Hammond D; Doxey J; Daniel S; Bansal-Travers M
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2011 Jul; 13(7):579-88. PubMed ID: 21486994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of Fully Branded and Standardized e-Cigarette Packaging With Interest in Trying Products Among Youths and Adults in Great Britain.
    Taylor E; Arnott D; Cheeseman H; Hammond D; Reid JL; McNeill A; Driezen P; East K
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e231799. PubMed ID: 36917111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers' ratings of plain and branded cigarette packaging: an experimental study.
    Guillaumier A; Bonevski B; Paul C; Durkin S; D'Este C
    BMJ Open; 2014 Feb; 4(2):e004078. PubMed ID: 24503299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of pictorial warning label message framing and standardized packaging on cigarette packaging appeal among young adult smokers.
    Johnson AC; Luta G; Tercyak KP; Niaura RS; Mays D
    Addict Behav; 2021 Sep; 120():106951. PubMed ID: 33895661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth.
    Hammond D; Dockrell M; Arnott D; Lee A; McNeill A
    Eur J Public Health; 2009 Dec; 19(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 19726589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do larger pictorial health warnings diminish the need for plain packaging of cigarettes?
    Wakefield M; Germain D; Durkin S; Hammond D; Goldberg M; Borland R
    Addiction; 2012 Jun; 107(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 22372966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.
    Wakefield MA; Germain D; Durkin SJ
    Tob Control; 2008 Dec; 17(6):416-21. PubMed ID: 18827035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Young smokers and non-smokers perceptions of typical users of plain vs. branded cigarette packs: a between-subjects experimental survey.
    Lund I; Scheffels J
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Oct; 13():1005. PubMed ID: 24156515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Hammond D; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2012 Sep; 21(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 21998127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standardised packs and larger health warnings: visual attention and perceptions among Colombian smokers and non-smokers.
    Sillero-Rejon C; Mahmoud O; Tamayo RM; Clavijo-Alvarez AA; Adams S; Maynard OM
    Addiction; 2022 Jun; 117(6):1737-1747. PubMed ID: 34882868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S.
    Bansal-Travers M; Hammond D; Smith P; Cummings KM
    Am J Prev Med; 2011 Jun; 40(6):674-82. PubMed ID: 21565661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptions of plain packaging among young adult roll-your-own smokers in France: a naturalistic approach.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2015 Mar; 24(e1):e39-44. PubMed ID: 24920573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study.
    Wakefield MA; Hayes L; Durkin S; Borland R
    BMJ Open; 2013; 3(7):. PubMed ID: 23878174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.