BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24309339)

  • 1. Gingival microleakage of class V composite restorations with fiber inserts.
    Ahmed W; El-Badrawy W; Kulkarni G; Prakki A; El-Mowafy O
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):622-8. PubMed ID: 24309339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gingival microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts.
    El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Eltanty A; Abbasi K; Habib N
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 17555183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of silorane-based composite and nanohybrid composite with or without polyethylene fiber inserts in class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Agrawal VS; Parekh VV; Shah NC
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-7. PubMed ID: 22616928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of surface pretreatment on the microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restorations.
    Bayrak S; Sen TE; Tuloglu N
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 36(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 22838231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Wegley C
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
    Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
    Sadeghi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the influence of three different temperatures on microleakage of two self-etch and one total-etch adhesives.
    Akbarian S; Sharafeddin F; Akbarian G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Mar; 16(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 26057914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gingival seal of deep Class II direct and indirect composite restorations.
    Kenyon BJ; Frederickson D; Hagge MS
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 17380801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of class V resin composites using various self-etching adhesives: an in vitro study.
    Chandra PV; Harikumar V; Ramkiran D; Krishna MJ; Gouda MV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23579893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of tetric ceram/excite and Ariston pHc/Ariston liner.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):309-13. PubMed ID: 11803996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.