BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24309339)

  • 21. Effect of three different mouthrinses on microleakage of composite resin restorations with two adhesive systems after bleaching with 10% carbamide peroxide.
    Ajami AA; Bahari M; Oskoee SS; Kimyai S; Kahnamoui MA; Rikhtegaran S; Ghaffarian R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 22430688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength and Microleakage of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite.
    Yuan H; Li M; Guo B; Gao Y; Liu H; Li J
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Dec; 17(6):535-43. PubMed ID: 26734678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microleakage of a self-adhesive class V composite on primary and permanent dentitions.
    Shafiei L; Mojiri P; Ghahraman Y; Rakhshan V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 24171990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems.
    Bedran de Castro AK; Pimenta LA; Amaral CM; Ambrosano GM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 12008798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of surface sealants on marginal microleakage in Class V resin composite restorations.
    Silva Santana SV; Bombana AC; Flório FM; Basting RT
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(6):397-404. PubMed ID: 20002927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around Class V restorations bonded with seven self-etching adhesives.
    Santini A; Ivanovic V; Ibbetson R; Milia E
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(2):128-35; discussion 136. PubMed ID: 15500062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber-reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Watts DC; Lassila LV
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 17531311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
    Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 19544820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
    Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage of self-etch primer/adhesives in endodontically treated teeth.
    Korasli D; Ziraman F; Ozyurt P; Cehreli SB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 May; 138(5):634-40. PubMed ID: 17473042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
    Fourie J; Smit CF
    SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of flexural load cycling on microleakage of extended root caries restorations.
    Minakuchi S; Munoz CA; Jessop N
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 15853110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.