206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24309343)
1. Accuracy of electronic apex locator in enlarged root canals with different root canal irrigants: an in vitro study.
Dinapadu S; Pasari S; Admala SR; Marukala NR; Gurram S; Peddi R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):649-52. PubMed ID: 24309343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of Dentaport ZX apex locator in enlarged root canals.
Ebrahim AK; Wadachi R; Suda H
Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 17969287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo evaluation of the iPex and Root ZX electronic apex locators using various irrigants.
Duran-Sindreu F; Gomes S; Stöber E; Mercadé M; Jané L; Roig M
Int Endod J; 2013 Aug; 46(8):769-74. PubMed ID: 23551276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo evaluation of the Raypex 5 by using different irrigants.
Gomes S; Oliver R; Macouzet C; Mercadé M; Roig M; Duran-Sindreu F
J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1075-7. PubMed ID: 22794208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of file size, sodium hypochlorite and blood on the accuracy of Root ZX apex locator in enlarged root canals: an in vitro study.
Ebrahim AK; Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H
Aust Dent J; 2006 Jun; 51(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 16848263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of electronic apex locator in length determination in the presence of different irrigants: An in vitro study.
; Muthu MS; Sivakumar N
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2006 Dec; 24(4):182-5. PubMed ID: 17183181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical diameter of apical foramen and of file size using the Root ZX apex locator: an in vitro study.
Herrera M; Ábalos C; Lucena C; Jiménez-Planas A; Llamas R
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1306-9. PubMed ID: 21846555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of tooth length on the accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apical foramen locator: an ex vivo study.
Saatchi M; Rahimi I; Khademi A; Farhad AR; Nekoofar MH; Dummer PM
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Feb; 73(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 25299599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study.
Kaufman AY; Keila S; Yoshpe M
Int Endod J; 2002 Feb; 35(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 11843975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique.
Kim E; Marmo M; Lee CY; Oh NS; Kim IK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Apr; 105(4):e79-83. PubMed ID: 18329572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of sodium hypochlorite irrigation on the accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator.
Meares WA; Steiman HR
J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):595-8. PubMed ID: 12184422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Invitro Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Electronic Apex Locators to Determine Working Length in the Presence of Various Irrigants.
Prasad AB; Harshit S; Aastha SA; Deepak R
Ethiop J Health Sci; 2016 Sep; 26(5):457-462. PubMed ID: 28446851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An ex vivo comparison of working length determination by 3 electronic apex locators.
Pascon EA; Marrelli M; Congi O; Ciancio R; Miceli F; Versiani MA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):e147-51. PubMed ID: 19716484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the Dentaport ZX apex locator for working length determination when retreating molar root canals.
Cimilli H; Aydemir S; Arican B; Mumcu G; Chandler N; Kartal N
Aust Endod J; 2014 Apr; 40(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 24697957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vivo evaluation of different methods of working length determination.
Mandlik J; Shah N; Pawar K; Gupta P; Singh S; Shaik SA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 24309342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator in the retreatment of teeth obturated with plastic or cross-linked gutta-percha carrier-based materials: an ex vivo study.
Mancini M; Palopoli P; Iorio L; Conte G; Cianconi L
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2061-5. PubMed ID: 25443281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining the apical preparation size in premolars: part III.
Hecker H; Bartha T; Löst C; Weiger R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 20610301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Working length determination in general dental practice: a randomised controlled trial.
Jarad FD; Albadri S; Gamble C; Burnside G; Fox K; Ashley JR; Peers G; Preston AJ
Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(12):595-8. PubMed ID: 22193485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ex vivo evaluation of the ability of four different electronic apex locators to determine the working length in teeth with various foramen diameters.
Ebrahim AK; Wadachi R; Suda H
Aust Dent J; 2006 Sep; 51(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 17037894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of apical constriction diameter on Root ZX apex locator precision.
Herrera M; Abalos C; Planas AJ; Llamas R
J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):995-8. PubMed ID: 17878091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
