These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24309344)

  • 1. A scanning electron microscopic study to evaluate the efficacy of NaviTip FX in removing the canal debris during root canal preparation: an in vitro study.
    Chandra V; Gandi P; Shivanna AK; Srinivas S; Himgiri S; Nischith KG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):653-6. PubMed ID: 24309344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Root canal debris removal using different irrigating needles: an SEM study.
    Ghivari S; Kubasad G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 22406709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Goel S; Tewari S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 19576804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of a new brush-covered irrigation needle in removing root canal debris: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Al-Hadlaq SM; Al-Turaiki SA; Al-Sulami U; Saad AY
    J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1181-4. PubMed ID: 17174678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.
    Guo X; Miao H; Li L; Zhang S; Zhou D; Lu Y; Wu L
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 14():114. PubMed ID: 25201549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Kamel WH; Kataia EM
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
    Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles.
    Drukteinis S; Balciuniene I
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(3):70-5. PubMed ID: 17191061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF
    J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.
    Alkahtani A; Al Khudhairi TD; Anil S
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Feb; 14():12. PubMed ID: 24512441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.
    Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Armellin E; Conte G; Cianconi L
    J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1456-60. PubMed ID: 24139274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal surfaces prepared with three rotary endodontic systems: Lightspeed, ProTaper and EndoWave.
    Hema BS; Chandu GS; Shiraguppi VL
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 25511358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Root Canal Dentin Erosion after Different Irrigation Methods Using Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy.
    Wang Z; Maezono H; Shen Y; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1834-1839. PubMed ID: 27769680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of final irrigant protocols for debris removal from simulated canal irregularities.
    Martins Justo A; Abreu da Rosa R; Santini MF; Cardoso Ferreira MB; Pereira JR; Húngaro Duarte MA; Reis Só MV
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2009-14. PubMed ID: 25266470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars.
    Paqué F; Al-Jadaa A; Kfir A
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 22188277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    Singh AK; Ramanna PK; Kumari D; Poddar P; Shah M; Dixit A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1003-1007. PubMed ID: 35000943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of efficacy and cleaning ability of hand and rotary devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment: an in vitro study.
    Reddy N; Admala SR; Dinapadu S; Pasari S; Reddy MP; Rao MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 24309341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of canal cleanliness and smear layer removal after the use of the Quantec-E irrigation system and syringe: a comparative scanning electron microscope study.
    Setlock J; Fayad MI; BeGole E; Bruzick M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Nov; 96(5):614-7. PubMed ID: 14600698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.