BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24309636)

  • 1. Retraction blues.
    Nat Med; 2013 Dec; 19(12):1547-8. PubMed ID: 24309636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical and legal considerations in a case of research fraud.
    Kvaal SI
    J Am Coll Dent; 2008; 75(2):29-35. PubMed ID: 18777891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facing up to fraud.
    Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):137. PubMed ID: 12618791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retractions are increasing, but not enough.
    Oransky I
    Nature; 2022 Aug; 608(7921):9. PubMed ID: 35918520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific credit and credibility.
    Grant PM
    Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 12618792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The science of retraction.
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retractions of scientific publications: responsibility and accountability.
    Katavić V
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 24969915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeating probability of authors with retracted scientific publications.
    Kuroki T; Ukawa A
    Account Res; 2018; 25(4):212-219. PubMed ID: 29519161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis and implications of retraction period and coauthorship of fraudulent publications.
    Foo JY; Tan XJ
    Account Res; 2014; 21(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 24325213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic fabrication of scientific images revealed.
    Christopher J
    FEBS Lett; 2018 Sep; 592(18):3027-3029. PubMed ID: 30047985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retractions: trends, implications, and possible further steps.
    Giglia E; Pescarmona GP
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Jun; 48(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 22614895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correcting the scientific record.
    Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):381. PubMed ID: 18560424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing.
    Zietman AL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):225-7. PubMed ID: 23958142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misplaced faith.
    Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7554):6. PubMed ID: 26040858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6722):13-7. PubMed ID: 10078516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publish or perish in China.
    Qiu J
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shadow of doubt.
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Mar; 112(3):498-500. PubMed ID: 21296856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions.
    Corbyn Z
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7418):21. PubMed ID: 23038445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retraction of articles with misleading information.
    Gibbs NM
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2011 May; 39(3):344. PubMed ID: 21736182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.