These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24310286)

  • 1. Genetics of incompatibility inCorylus avellana L.
    Thompson MM
    Theor Appl Genet; 1979 May; 54(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 24310286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Procedures for identifying S-allele genotypes of Brassica.
    Wallace DH
    Theor Appl Genet; 1979 Nov; 54(6):249-65. PubMed ID: 24310482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial invasion of gametophytic self-incompatibility alleles in the absence of tight linkage between pollen and pistil S alleles.
    Sakai S; Wakoh H
    Am Nat; 2014 Aug; 184(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 25058284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dominance relationships among S-alleles in Corylus avellana L.
    Mehlenbacher SA; Thompson MM
    Theor Appl Genet; 1988 Nov; 76(5):669-72. PubMed ID: 24232343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic analysis of incompatibility in the diploid Ipomoea species closely related to the sweet potato.
    Kowyama Y; Shimano N; Kawase T
    Theor Appl Genet; 1980 May; 58(3-4):149-55. PubMed ID: 24301346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-incompatibility in passionfruit: evidence of gametophytic-sporophytic control.
    Suassuna Tde M; Bruckner H; de Carvalho R; Borém A
    Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Jan; 106(2):298-302. PubMed ID: 12582855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Duplicated pollen-pistil recognition loci control intraspecific unilateral incompatibility in Brassica rapa.
    Takada Y; Murase K; Shimosato-Asano H; Sato T; Nakanishi H; Suwabe K; Shimizu KK; Lim YP; Takayama S; Suzuki G; Watanabe M
    Nat Plants; 2017 Jun; 3():17096. PubMed ID: 28650458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incompatibility alleles in Corylus avellana L. cultivars.
    Thompson MM
    Theor Appl Genet; 1979 Jan; 55(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 24306387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-incompatibility and interspecific incompatibility: relationships in intra- and interspecific crosses of Zinnia elegans Jacq. and Z. angustifolia HBK (Compositae).
    Boyle TH; Stimart DP
    Theor Appl Genet; 1986 Dec; 73(2):305-15. PubMed ID: 24240866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetics of self incompatibility in diploid Ageratum houstonianum mill.
    Stephens LC; Ascher PD; Widmer RE
    Theor Appl Genet; 1982 Dec; 63(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 24270877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-incompatibility between two sympatric polyploid Solanum species.
    Camadro EL; Peloquin SJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 1981 Mar; 60(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 24276625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pistil-function breakdown in a new S-allele of European pear, S21*, confers self-compatibility.
    Sanzol J
    Plant Cell Rep; 2009 Mar; 28(3):457-67. PubMed ID: 19096853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic control of self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae): a successful colonizing species.
    Hiscock SJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 2000 Jul; 85 ( Pt 1)():10-9. PubMed ID: 10971686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of residues in a hydrophilic loop of the Papaver rhoeas S protein that play a crucial role in recognition of incompatible pollen.
    Kakeda K; Jordan ND; Conner A; Ride JP; Franklin-Tong VE; Franklin FC
    Plant Cell; 1998 Oct; 10(10):1723-32. PubMed ID: 9761798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pollination in species with dry stigmas: the nature of the early stigmatic response and the pathway taken by pollen tubes.
    Elleman CJ; Franklin-Tong V; Dickinson HG
    New Phytol; 1992 Jul; 121(3):413-424. PubMed ID: 33874153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolution of dominance in sporophytic self-incompatibility systems. II. Mate availability and recombination.
    Schoen DJ; Busch JW
    Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2099-113. PubMed ID: 19453382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New hypothesis elucidates self-incompatibility in the olive tree regarding S-alleles dominance relationships as in the sporophytic model.
    Breton CM; Bervillé A
    C R Biol; 2012 Sep; 335(9):563-72. PubMed ID: 23026087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of dominance in sporophytic self-incompatibility systems: I. Genetic load and coevolution of levels of dominance in pollen and pistil.
    Llaurens V; Billiard S; Castric V; Vekemans X
    Evolution; 2009 Sep; 63(9):2427-37. PubMed ID: 19473398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of pre-fertilization reproductive barriers and the underlying cytological mechanism in crosses among three petal-types of Jasminum sambac and their relevance to phylogenetic relationships.
    Deng Y; Sun X; Gu C; Jia X; Liang L; Su J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176026. PubMed ID: 28419158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Base-Pairing Requirements for Small RNA-Mediated Gene Silencing of Recessive Self-Incompatibility Alleles in
    Burghgraeve N; Simon S; Barral S; Fobis-Loisy I; Holl AC; Ponitzki C; Schmitt E; Vekemans X; Castric V
    Genetics; 2020 Jul; 215(3):653-664. PubMed ID: 32461267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.