236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24310982)
1. Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model.
Wagner S; Rampersad SM; Aydin Ü; Vorwerk J; Oostendorp TF; Neuling T; Herrmann CS; Stegeman DF; Wolters CH
J Neural Eng; 2014 Feb; 11(1):016002. PubMed ID: 24310982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model.
Suh HS; Lee WH; Kim TS
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6961-80. PubMed ID: 23044667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model.
Rampersad SM; Janssen AM; Lucka F; Aydin Ü; Lanfer B; Lew S; Wolters CH; Stegeman DF; Oostendorp TF
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 May; 22(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 24760939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods for high-resolution anisotropic finite element modeling of the human head: automatic MR white matter anisotropy-adaptive mesh generation.
Lee WH; Kim TS
Med Eng Phys; 2012 Jan; 34(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 21820347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Numerical investigation of white matter anisotropic conductivity in defining current distribution under tDCS.
Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jan; 109(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 23040278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model.
Sadleir RJ; Vannorsdall TD; Schretlen DJ; Gordon B
Neuroimage; 2010 Jul; 51(4):1310-8. PubMed ID: 20350607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target.
Schmidt C; Wagner S; Burger M; Rienen Uv; Wolters CH
J Neural Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):046028. PubMed ID: 26170066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion tensor MRI-based estimation of the influence of brain tissue anisotropy on the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation.
De Lucia M; Parker GJ; Embleton K; Newton JM; Walsh V
Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1159-70. PubMed ID: 17524673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions.
Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Schwartz B; Sadleir RJ
J Neural Eng; 2016 Dec; 13(6):066006. PubMed ID: 27705955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling transcranial DC stimulation.
Oostendorp TF; Hengeveld YA; Wolters CH; Stinstra J; van Elswijk G; Stegeman DF
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4226-9. PubMed ID: 19163645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation.
Opitz A; Paulus W; Will S; Antunes A; Thielscher A
Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 109():140-50. PubMed ID: 25613437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art.
Nielsen JD; Madsen KH; Puonti O; Siebner HR; Bauer C; Madsen CG; Saturnino GB; Thielscher A
Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():587-598. PubMed ID: 29518567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electric field and current density distribution in an anatomical head model during transcranial direct current stimulation for tinnitus treatment.
Parazzini M; Fiocchi S; Ravazzani P
Bioelectromagnetics; 2012 Sep; 33(6):476-87. PubMed ID: 22298345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EEG source analysis of epileptiform activity using a 1 mm anisotropic hexahedra finite element head model.
Rullmann M; Anwander A; Dannhauer M; Warfield SK; Duffy FH; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(2):399-410. PubMed ID: 18848896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiscale coupling of transcranial direct current stimulation to neuron electrodynamics: modeling the influence of the transcranial electric field on neuronal depolarization.
Dougherty ET; Turner JC; Vogel F
Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():360179. PubMed ID: 25404950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electric field distribution in a finite-volume head model of deep brain stimulation.
Grant PF; Lowery MM
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Nov; 31(9):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19656716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Thielscher A; Opitz A; Windhoff M
Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 20682353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value and cost of complexity in predictive modelling: role of tissue anisotropic conductivity and fibre tracts in neuromodulation.
Shahid SS; Bikson M; Salman H; Wen P; Ahfock T
J Neural Eng; 2014 Jun; 11(3):036002. PubMed ID: 24737098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
