BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24311725)

  • 1. Pediatric exclusivity: evolving legislation and novel complexities within pediatric therapeutic development.
    Rivera DR; Hartzema AG
    Ann Pharmacother; 2014 Mar; 48(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 24311725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of pediatric exclusivity on drug labeling and demonstrations of efficacy.
    Wharton GT; Murphy MD; Avant D; Goldsmith JV; Chai G; Rodriguez WJ; Eisenstein EL
    Pediatrics; 2014 Aug; 134(2):e512-8. PubMed ID: 25022732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety monitoring of drugs granted exclusivity under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act: what the FDA has learned.
    Mathis LL; Iyasu S
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Aug; 82(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 17632537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pediatric research: coming of age in the new millennium.
    Milne CP
    Am J Ther; 1999 Sep; 6(5):263-82. PubMed ID: 11329108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pediatric drug labeling: improving the safety and efficacy of pediatric therapies.
    Roberts R; Rodriguez W; Murphy D; Crescenzi T
    JAMA; 2003 Aug; 290(7):905-11. PubMed ID: 12928467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulation programs for pediatric drug research--do children really benefit?
    Boots I; Sukhai RN; Klein RH; Holl RA; Wit JM; Cohen AF; Burggraaf J
    Eur J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 166(8):849-55. PubMed ID: 17225950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act of 2002: the rise of the voluntary incentive structure and congressional refusal to require pediatric testing.
    Breslow LH
    Harvard J Legis; 2003; 40(1):133-93. PubMed ID: 16594116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new history and discussion of 180-day exclusivity.
    Korn DE; Lietzan E; Scott SW
    Food Drug Law J; 2009; 64(2):335-90. PubMed ID: 19999288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Administrative Meter Maid: Using Inter Partes Review and Post-Grant Review to Curb Exclusivity Parking via the "Failure to Market" Provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act.
    Apel BT
    Mich Law Rev; 2015; 114(1):107-36. PubMed ID: 26394458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adolescent dosing and labeling since the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007.
    Momper JD; Mulugeta Y; Green DJ; Karesh A; Krudys KM; Sachs HC; Yao LP; Burckart GJ
    JAMA Pediatr; 2013 Oct; 167(10):926-32. PubMed ID: 23921678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Pediatric drug development: ICH harmonized tripartite guideline E11 within the United States of America, the European Union, and Japan].
    Pflieger M; Bertram D
    Arch Pediatr; 2014 Oct; 21(10):1129-38. PubMed ID: 25175054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Labeling Changes and Costs for Clinical Trials Performed Under the US Food and Drug Administration Pediatric Exclusivity Extension, 2007 to 2012.
    Sinha MS; Najafzadeh M; Rajasingh EK; Love J; Kesselheim AS
    JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Nov; 178(11):1458-1466. PubMed ID: 30264138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Balancing US patent and FDA approval processes: strategically optimizing market exclusivity.
    Fernandez DS; Huie JT
    Drug Discov Today; 2004 Jun; 9(12):509-12. PubMed ID: 15183155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Economic return of clinical trials performed under the pediatric exclusivity program.
    Li JS; Eisenstein EL; Grabowski HG; Reid ED; Mangum B; Schulman KA; Goldsmith JV; Murphy MD; Califf RM; Benjamin DK
    JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(5):480-8. PubMed ID: 17284698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer-reviewed publication of clinical trials completed for pediatric exclusivity.
    Benjamin DK; Smith PB; Murphy MD; Roberts R; Mathis L; Avant D; Califf RM; Li JS
    JAMA; 2006 Sep; 296(10):1266-73. PubMed ID: 16968851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Has the FDA Amendments Act of 2007 impaired drug development?
    Franson TR
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Feb; 89(2):169-71. PubMed ID: 21252933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act and the Pediatric Research Equity Act: What can the obstetric community learn from the pediatric experience?
    Ren Z; Zajicek A
    Semin Perinatol; 2015 Nov; 39(7):530-1. PubMed ID: 26455383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A brief history of 180-day exclusivity under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
    Lietzan EK
    Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(2):287-323. PubMed ID: 15298013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The economics of pediatric formulation development for off-patent drugs.
    Milne CP; Bruss JB
    Clin Ther; 2008 Nov; 30(11):2133-45. PubMed ID: 19108801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring the patient health, societal and economic benefits of US pediatric therapeutics legislation.
    Vernon JA; Shortenhaus SH; Mayer MH; Allen AJ; Golec JH
    Paediatr Drugs; 2012 Oct; 14(5):283-94. PubMed ID: 22775493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.