These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24311972)

  • 41. Two-Stage Copy-Move Forgery Detection With Self Deep Matching and Proposal SuperGlue.
    Liu Y; Xia C; Zhu X; Xu S
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():541-555. PubMed ID: 34890330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A complete passive blind image copy-move forensics scheme based on compound statistics features.
    Peng F; Nie YY; Long M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):e21-5. PubMed ID: 21726968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Exposing Digital Image Forgeries by Detecting Contextual Abnormality Using Convolutional Neural Networks.
    Jang H; Hou JU
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32316220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Identification method for digital image forgery and filtering region through interpolation.
    Hwang MG; Har DH
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Sep; 59(5):1372-85. PubMed ID: 24894705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Robust dense-field based copy-move forgery localization using generic radial harmonic Fourier moment invariants.
    Atallah AM; Mahmoud II; Ali HS
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):139-152. PubMed ID: 37924251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A new anti-forensic scheme--hiding the single JPEG compression trace for digital image.
    Cao Y; Gao T; Sheng G; Fan L; Gao L
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 25442510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Benchmarking Scientific Image Forgery Detectors.
    Cardenuto JP; Rocha A
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2022 Aug; 28(4):35. PubMed ID: 35943614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An effective content-based image retrieval technique for image visuals representation based on the bag-of-visual-words model.
    Jabeen S; Mehmood Z; Mahmood T; Saba T; Rehman A; Mahmood MT
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194526. PubMed ID: 29694429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Optimal Model for Copy-Move Forgery Detection in Medical Images.
    Amiri E; Mosallanejad A; Sheikhahmadi A
    J Med Signals Sens; 2024; 14():5. PubMed ID: 38993207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Performance of SURF and SIFT Keypoints for the Automated Differentiation of Abnormality in Chest Radiographs.
    Govindarajan S; Swaminathan R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():510-511. PubMed ID: 34042625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Face Forgery Detection by 3D Decomposition and Composition Search.
    Zhu X; Fei H; Zhang B; Zhang T; Zhang X; Li SZ; Lei Z
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2023 Jul; 45(7):8342-8357. PubMed ID: 37018279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comprehensive taxonomy on multimedia video forgery detection techniques: challenges and novel trends.
    El-Shafai W; Fouda MA; El-Rabaie EM; El-Salam NA
    Multimed Tools Appl; 2023 May; ():1-67. PubMed ID: 37362636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. CFDMI-SEC: An optimal model for copy-move forgery detection of medical image using SIFT, EOM and CHM.
    Amiri E; Mosallanejad A; Sheikhahmadi A
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0303332. PubMed ID: 39042655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Harmonizing Image Forgery Detection & Localization: Fusion of Complementary Approaches.
    Mareen H; De Neve L; Lambert P; Van Wallendael G
    J Imaging; 2023 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 38248989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Image mosaicking using SURF features of line segments.
    Yang Z; Shen D; Yap PT
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173627. PubMed ID: 28296919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Behavior Knowledge Space-Based Fusion for Copy-Move Forgery Detection.
    Ferreira A; Felipussi SC; Alfaro C; Fonseca P; Vargas-Munoz JE; Dos Santos JA; Rocha A
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Oct; 25(10):4729-4742. PubMed ID: 27448361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of confocal scanning laser microscopy specific acquisition parameters on the detection and matching of speeded-up robust features.
    Stanciu SG; Hristu R; Stanciu GA
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 Apr; 111(5):364-74. PubMed ID: 21349249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Detection and localization of image forgeries using improved mask regional convolutional neural network.
    Wang XY; Wang H; Niu SZ; Zhang JW
    Math Biosci Eng; 2019 May; 16(5):4581-4593. PubMed ID: 31499678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Exposing splicing forgery based on color temperature estimation.
    Sun P; Lang Y; Fan S; Shen Z; Liu L; Shan D; Peng S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():1-11. PubMed ID: 29787885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comprehensive analyses of image forgery detection methods from traditional to deep learning approaches: an evaluation.
    Sharma P; Kumar M; Sharma H
    Multimed Tools Appl; 2023; 82(12):18117-18150. PubMed ID: 36213342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.