BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24312121)

  • 1. The null distribution of likelihood-ratio statistics in the conditional-logistic linkage model.
    Song YE; Elston RC
    Front Genet; 2013; 4():244. PubMed ID: 24312121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A score test for the linkage analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits based on identity by descent data from sib-pairs.
    Dudoit S; Speed TP
    Biostatistics; 2000 Mar; 1(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 12933522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical significance values for linkage analysis: trait simulation using posterior model distributions from MCMC oligogenic segregation analysis.
    Igo RP; Wijsman EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 32(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 17849492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the choice of linkage statistics.
    Margaritte-Jeannin P; Babron MC; Clerget-Darpoux F
    BMC Proc; 2007; 1 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S102. PubMed ID: 18466442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power and robustness of a score test for linkage analysis of quantitative traits using identity by descent data on sib pairs.
    Goldstein DR; Dudoit S; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 May; 20(4):415-31. PubMed ID: 11319783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of methods incorporating quantitative covariates into affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Tsai HJ; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 30(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 16355406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MOD-score analysis with simple pedigrees: an overview of likelihood-based linkage methods.
    Strauch K
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 17536213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of empirical p values from asymptotic p values for conditional logistic affected relative pair linkage analysis.
    Sinha M; Song Y; Elston RC; Olson JM; Goddard KA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 16612102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconsidering the asymptotic null distribution of likelihood ratio tests for genetic linkage in multivariate variance components models under complete pleiotropy.
    Han SS; Chang JT
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):226-41. PubMed ID: 20029057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Score statistics for mapping quantitative trait loci.
    Chang MN; Wu R; Wu SS; Casella G
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article 16. PubMed ID: 19222383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A note on the asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage tests.
    Wang K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 68(Pt 4):367-75. PubMed ID: 15225162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transmission/disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits.
    Zhu X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 11119297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The null distribution of the heterogeneity lod score does depend on the assumed genetic model for the trait.
    Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 11713418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Global tests for linkage.
    el Galta R; van Houwelingen HC; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 19197957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A logistic regression mixture model for interval mapping of genetic trait loci affecting binary phenotypes.
    Deng W; Chen H; Li Z
    Genetics; 2006 Feb; 172(2):1349-58. PubMed ID: 16272416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Model-free linkage analysis with covariates confirms linkage of prostate cancer to chromosomes 1 and 4.
    Goddard KA; Witte JS; Suarez BK; Catalona WJ; Olson JM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1197-206. PubMed ID: 11309685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs.
    Liang KY; Huang CY; Beaty TH
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1631-41. PubMed ID: 10762548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.