These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24312725)

  • 1. Spatially balanced topological interaction grants optimal cohesion in flocking models.
    Camperi M; Cavagna A; Giardina I; Parisi G; Silvestri E
    Interface Focus; 2012 Dec; 2(6):715-25. PubMed ID: 24312725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficient flocking: metric versus topological interactions.
    Kumar V; De R
    R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Sep; 8(9):202158. PubMed ID: 34631117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study.
    Ballerini M; Cabibbo N; Candelier R; Cavagna A; Cisbani E; Giardina I; Lecomte V; Orlandi A; Parisi G; Procaccini A; Viale M; Zdravkovic V
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan; 105(4):1232-7. PubMed ID: 18227508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emergence of the scale-invariant proportion in a flock from the metric-topological interaction.
    Niizato T; Murakami H; Gunji YP
    Biosystems; 2014 May; 119():62-8. PubMed ID: 24686118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fluctuation-driven flocking movement in three dimensions and scale-free correlation.
    Niizato T; Gunji YP
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e35615. PubMed ID: 22662109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relevance of metric-free interactions in flocking phenomena.
    Ginelli F; Chaté H
    Phys Rev Lett; 2010 Oct; 105(16):168103. PubMed ID: 21231019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the neighborhood of interaction in human crowds metric, topological, or visual?
    Wirth TD; Dachner GC; Rio KW; Warren WH
    PNAS Nexus; 2023 May; 2(5):pgad118. PubMed ID: 37200800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusion and topological neighbours in flocks of starlings: relating a model to empirical data.
    Hemelrijk CK; Hildenbrandt H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126913. PubMed ID: 25993474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diffusion of individual birds in starling flocks.
    Cavagna A; Duarte Queirós SM; Giardina I; Stefanini F; Viale M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Apr; 280(1756):20122484. PubMed ID: 23407827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioural plasticity and the transition to order in jackdaw flocks.
    Ling H; Mclvor GE; Westley J; van der Vaart K; Vaughan RT; Thornton A; Ouellette NT
    Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5174. PubMed ID: 31729384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomness in the choice of neighbours promotes cohesion in mobile animal groups.
    Jadhav V; Guttal V; Masila DR
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Mar; 9(3):220124. PubMed ID: 35345437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limited interactions in flocks: relating model simulations to empirical data.
    Bode NW; Franks DW; Wood AJ
    J R Soc Interface; 2011 Feb; 8(55):301-4. PubMed ID: 20826476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A flocking algorithm for multi-agent systems with connectivity preservation under hybrid metric-topological interactions.
    He C; Feng Z; Ren Z
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192987. PubMed ID: 29462217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical mechanics for natural flocks of birds.
    Bialek W; Cavagna A; Giardina I; Mora T; Silvestri E; Viale M; Walczak AM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Mar; 109(13):4786-91. PubMed ID: 22427355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence of a robust universality class in the critical behavior of self-propelled agents: metric versus topological interactions.
    Barberis L; Albano EV
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Jan; 89(1):012139. PubMed ID: 24580204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collective response to local perturbations: how to evade threats without losing coherence.
    Loffredo E; Venturelli D; Giardina I
    Phys Biol; 2023 Apr; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36940477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alignment with neighbours enables escape from dead ends in flocking models.
    Joshi V; Popp S; Werfel J; McCreery HF
    J R Soc Interface; 2022 Aug; 19(193):20220356. PubMed ID: 35975561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using field data to test locust migratory band collective movement models.
    Buhl J; Sword GA; Simpson SJ
    Interface Focus; 2012 Dec; 2(6):757-63. PubMed ID: 24312729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the number of topologically interacting neighbors on swarm dynamics.
    Shang Y; Bouffanais R
    Sci Rep; 2014 Feb; 4():4184. PubMed ID: 24567077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kinetic theory for systems of self-propelled particles with metric-free interactions.
    Chou YL; Wolfe R; Ihle T
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Aug; 86(2 Pt 1):021120. PubMed ID: 23005735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.