These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24313174)

  • 1. Reliability of conventional shade guides in teeth color determination.
    Todorović A; Todorović A; Gostović AS; Lazić V; Milicić B; Djurisić S
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Oct; 70(10):929-34. PubMed ID: 24313174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices.
    Baltzer A; Kaufmann-Jinoian V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 16201397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching.
    Igiel C; Lehmann KM; Ghinea R; Weyhrauch M; Hangx Y; Scheller H; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):303-308. PubMed ID: 28742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
    Liberato WF; Barreto IC; Costa PP; de Almeida CC; Pimentel W; Tiossi R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 30722987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental color-matching devices.
    Tsiliagkou A; Diamantopoulou S; Papazoglou E; Kakaboura A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 26835527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching.
    Okubo SR; Kanawati A; Richards MW; Childress S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Dec; 80(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 9830067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colour correspondence of a ceramic system in two different shade guides.
    Corciolani G; Vichi A; Goracci C; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2009 Feb; 37(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 18996635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual and instrumental coverage error of two dental shade guides: an in vivo study.
    Ruiz-López J; Perez MM; Lucena C; Pulgar R; López-Toruño A; Tejada-Casado M; Ghinea R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5961-5968. PubMed ID: 35639206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of an anatomic dual-laminate composite resin shade guide.
    Magne P; Bruzi G; Carvalho AO; Giannini M; Maia HP
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41 Suppl 3():e80-6. PubMed ID: 23685035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance assessment of dental shade guides.
    Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e15-20. PubMed ID: 19329240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Color perceptibility and validity of silicon carbide-based protective coatings for dental ceramics.
    Fares C; Elhassani R; Ren F; Cabrera AR; Chai I; Neal D; Hsu SM; Esquivel-Upshaw JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):918-924. PubMed ID: 33483139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.
    Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Alessandretti R; Pérez MM; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 26631341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colour compatibility between teeth and dental shade guides in Quinquagenarians and Septuagenarians.
    Cocking C; Cevirgen E; Helling S; Oswald M; Corcodel N; Rammelsberg P; Reinelt G; Hassel AJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 36(11):848-55. PubMed ID: 19793231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices.
    Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Davis EL; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19231572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.
    Da Silva JD; Park SE; Weber HP; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 18456047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Difference in illuminant-dependent color changes of shade guide tabs by the shade designation relative to three illuminants.
    Cha HS; Lee YK
    Am J Dent; 2009 Dec; 22(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 20178211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of different light sources on tooth shade selection.
    Śmielecka M; Dorocka-Bobkowska B
    Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 32068979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel sample design for determining color compatibility between layered resin composite and vita shade guides.
    Ismail EH; Dawson DV; Maia RR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jan; 32(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 31565829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.