64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24313603)
1. Virtually simulated social pressure influences early visual processing more in low compared to high autonomous participants.
Trautmann-Lengsfeld SA; Herrmann CS
Psychophysiology; 2014 Feb; 51(2):124-35. PubMed ID: 24313603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EEG reveals an early influence of social conformity on visual processing in group pressure situations.
Trautmann-Lengsfeld SA; Herrmann CS
Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 23163969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Doing what others see: visuomotor conversion to informational social influence.
Skewes JC; Skewes L; Roepstorff A; Frith CD
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1291-303. PubMed ID: 23398254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Instructional climates in preschool children who are at-risk. Part II: perceived physical competence.
Robinson LE; Rudisill ME; Goodway JD
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2009 Sep; 80(3):543-51. PubMed ID: 19791640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task.
Jones A; Forster B
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brain dynamics of upstream perceptual processes leading to visual object recognition: a high density ERP topographic mapping study.
Schettino A; Loeys T; Delplanque S; Pourtois G
Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1227-41. PubMed ID: 21237274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Driving difficulties of brain-injured drivers in reaction to high-crash-risk simulated road events: a question of impaired divided attention?
Cyr AA; Stinchcombe A; Gagnon S; Marshall S; Hing MM; Finestone H
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 31(4):472-82. PubMed ID: 18686115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Processing emotion from the eyes: a divided visual field and ERP study.
Beaton AA; Fouquet NC; Maycock NC; Platt E; Payne LS; Derrett A
Laterality; 2012; 17(4):486-514. PubMed ID: 21337252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electromagnetic evidence of altered visual processing in autism.
Neumann N; Dubischar-Krivec AM; Poustka F; Birbaumer N; Bölte S; Braun C
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Sep; 49(11):3011-7. PubMed ID: 21762713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. I did it: unconscious expectation of sensory consequences modulates the experience of self-agency and its functional signature.
Gentsch A; Schütz-Bosbach S
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 23(12):3817-28. PubMed ID: 21452945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. His or mine? The time course of self-other discrimination in emotion processing.
Herbert C; Herbert BM; Ethofer T; Pauli P
Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(3):277-88. PubMed ID: 21104542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combining features from ERP components in single-trial EEG for discriminating four-category visual objects.
Wang C; Xiong S; Hu X; Yao L; Zhang J
J Neural Eng; 2012 Oct; 9(5):056013. PubMed ID: 22983495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does bimodal stimulus presentation increase ERP components usable in BCIs?
Thurlings ME; Brouwer AM; Van Erp JB; Blankertz B; Werkhoven PJ
J Neural Eng; 2012 Aug; 9(4):045005. PubMed ID: 22831989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alpha spindles as neurophysiological correlates indicating attentional shift in a simulated driving task.
Sonnleitner A; Simon M; Kincses WE; Buchner A; Schrauf M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 22094045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When and where perceptual load interacts with voluntary visuospatial attention: an event-related potential and dipole modeling study.
Fu S; Zinni M; Squire PN; Kumar R; Caggiano DM; Parasuraman R
Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1345-55. PubMed ID: 18006335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neurobiological correlates of social conformity and independence during mental rotation.
Berns GS; Chappelow J; Zink CF; Pagnoni G; Martin-Skurski ME; Richards J
Biol Psychiatry; 2005 Aug; 58(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 15978553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Costs and benefits of autonomy when learning a task: an experimental approach.
Wielenga-Meijer EG; Taris TW; Wigboldus DH; Kompier MA
J Soc Psychol; 2011; 151(3):292-313. PubMed ID: 21675183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flanker interference in young and older participants as reflected in event-related potentials.
Wild-Wall N; Falkenstein M; Hohnsbein J
Brain Res; 2008 May; 1211():72-84. PubMed ID: 18433737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Isolating the neural mechanisms of interference during continuous multisensory dual-task performance.
Kasper RW; Cecotti H; Touryan J; Eckstein MP; Giesbrecht B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 24047391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
