These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24313831)

  • 21. A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities.
    Bleichrodt H
    Health Econ; 2002 Jul; 11(5):447-56. PubMed ID: 12112493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The standard gamble showed better construct validity than the time trade-off.
    Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Wong E; Griffith L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 60(10):1029-33. PubMed ID: 17884597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of methods for converting DCE values onto the full health-dead QALY scale.
    Rowen D; Brazier J; Van Hout B
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):328-40. PubMed ID: 25398621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Elicitation of health state utilities associated with differing durations of morning stiffness in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Iqbal I; Dasgupta B; Taylor P; Heron L; Pilling C
    J Med Econ; 2012; 15(6):1192-200. PubMed ID: 22804691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Health values of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection.
    Sherman KE; Sherman SN; Chenier T; Tsevat J
    Arch Intern Med; 2004 Nov; 164(21):2377-82. PubMed ID: 15557419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Chained time trade-off and standard gamble methods. Applications in oesophageal cancer.
    McNamee P; Glendinning S; Shenfine J; Steen N; Griffin SM; Bond J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2004 Feb; 5(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 15452769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores reported from parents and their children with chronic illness differed depending on utility elicitation method.
    Sung L; Young NL; Greenberg ML; McLimont M; Samanta T; Wong J; Rubenstein J; Ingber S; Doyle JJ; Feldman BM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Nov; 57(11):1161-6. PubMed ID: 15567632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pain quality of life as measured by utilities.
    Wetherington S; Delong L; Kini S; Veledar E; Schaufele MK; McKenzie-Brown AM; Chen SC
    Pain Med; 2014 May; 15(5):865-70. PubMed ID: 24716656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Population preference values for health states in relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the United Kingdom.
    Aristides M; Barlev A; Barber B; Gijsen M; Quinn C
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Nov; 13():181. PubMed ID: 26573610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries.
    Lin MR; Hwang HF; Chung KP; Huang C; Chen CY
    Phys Ther; 2006 Mar; 86(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 16506870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Valuation of scleroderma and psoriatic arthritis health states by the general public.
    Khanna D; Frech T; Khanna PP; Kaplan RM; Eckman MH; Hays RD; Ginsburg SS; Leonard AC; Tsevat J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2010 Oct; 8():112. PubMed ID: 20920309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Utility assessment among patients of primary angle closure/glaucoma in China: a preliminary study.
    Sun X; Zhang S; Wang N; Liang Y; Wang L; Fan S; Sun L
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 93(7):871-4. PubMed ID: 19208679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cognitive impairment and preferences for current health.
    King JT; Tsevat J; Roberts MS
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2009 Jan; 7():1. PubMed ID: 19134191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What value health?: A review of health state values used in early technology assessments for NICE.
    Stein K; Fry A; Round A; Milne R; Brazier J
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2005; 4(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 16466273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of standard gamble, time trade-off, and adjusted time trade-off scores.
    Martin AJ; Glasziou PP; Simes RJ; Lumley T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 10815360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Health utility ratings for a spectrum of alcohol-related health states.
    Kraemer KL; Roberts MS; Horton NJ; Palfai T; Samet JH; Freedner N; Tibbetts N; Saitz R
    Med Care; 2005 Jun; 43(6):541-50. PubMed ID: 15908848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Health utility bias: a systematic review and meta-analytic evaluation.
    Doctor JN; Bleichrodt H; Lin HJ
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 18556637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patient and public preferences for health states associated with AMD.
    Butt T; Dunbar HM; Morris S; Orr S; Rubin GS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Aug; 90(8):855-60. PubMed ID: 23811607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Utility values among myopic patients in mainland China.
    Li S; Wang G; Xu Y; Gray A; Chen G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Jul; 91(7):723-9. PubMed ID: 24901487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mastopexy for breast ptosis: Utility outcomes of population preferences.
    Ibrahim AM; Sinno HH; Izadpanah A; Vorstenbosch J; Dionisopoulos T; Markarian MK; Lee BT; Lin SJ
    Plast Surg (Oakv); 2015; 23(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 26090352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.