These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24314247)
1. [Value of computer-assisted slide-screening system in ThinPrep cervical cytology]. Yang J; Tao K; Yang H; Guo ZH; Hu YM; Tan ZY Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 42(9):609-12. PubMed ID: 24314247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center. Duby JM; DiFurio MJ Cancer; 2009 Aug; 117(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 19536887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of the ThinPrep Imaging System in the detection of abnormal cervicovaginal cytology: a practical experience in Korea. Ha SY; Lee YK; Oh YL Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 23406895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of the Thin Prep Imaging System® in the detection of squamous intraepithelial abnormalities on retrospective evaluation: can we trust the imager? Barroeta JE; Reilly ME; Steinhoff MM; Lawrence WD Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 22246928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population. Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Leung BS; Khoo US; Ng AW Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 14681939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System. Biscotti CV; Dawson AE; Dziura B; Galup L; Darragh T; Rahemtulla A; Wills-Frank L Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 15842055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ThinPrep Pap test. A review of clinical studies. Linder J; Zahniser D Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 9022723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System for internal quality control of cervical cytology. Heard T; Chandra A; Culora G; Gupta SS; Herbert A; Morgan M Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 22937891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A thin-layer, liquid-based pap test for mass screening in an area of China with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. A cross-sectional, comparative study. Pan Q; Belinson JL; Li L; Pretorius RG; Qiao YL; Zhang WH; Zhang X; Wu LY; Rong SD; Sun YT Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 12585030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective parallel randomized trial of the MultiCyte™ ThinPrep(®) imaging system: the Scottish experience. Palmer TJ; Nicoll SM; McKean ME; Park AJ; Bishop D; Baker L; Imrie JE Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 22616770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: II. Prospective and archival sensitivity studies. Patten SF; Lee JS; Wilbur DC; Bonfiglio TA; Colgan TJ; Richart RM; Cramer H; Moinuddin S Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 9438459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of a liquid-based Pap test and concurrent HPV DNA assay of residual samples. A study of 608 cases. Hong IS; Marshalleck J; Williams RH; Gaiter TE; Mielzynska-Lohnas I; Kim K Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(5):828-34. PubMed ID: 12365215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening. Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of cervical cytology screening methods and staining protocols for detection rate and accurate interpretation of ASC-H: Data from a high-volume laboratory in Turkey. Ozlem A; Umit I Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):863-9. PubMed ID: 26173757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice. Wilbur DC; Prey MU; Miller WM; Pawlick GF; Colgan TJ Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system. Bolick DR; Hellman DJ Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9479342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of ThinPrep Integrated Imager-Assisted Screening versus Manual Screening of ThinPrep Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens. Tanaka K; Aoki D; Tozawa-Ono A; Suzuki N; Takamatsu K; Nakamura M; Tsunoda H; Seino S; Kobayashi N; Shirayama T; Takahashi F Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 32535593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Significance of p16/Ki-67 double immunocytochemical staining in cervical cytology ASCUS, LSIL, and ASC-H]. Wu Y; Zhao J; Hu J; Wu XW; Zhu LR Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):734-739. PubMed ID: 29179267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of Pap test in combination with ThinPrep cytological test in screening for cervical cancer. Chen H; Shu HM; Chang ZL; Wang ZF; Yao HH; Zhu HM; Lu TM; Ma QY; Yang BL Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(4):1651-5. PubMed ID: 22799383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]