277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24314522)
1. The human DNA content in artifacts deposited by the blowfly Lucilia cuprina fed human blood, semen and saliva.
Durdle A; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):212-9. PubMed ID: 24314522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The morphology of fecal and regurgitation artifacts deposited by the blow fly Lucilia cuprina fed a diet of human blood.
Durdle A; van Oorschot RA; Mitchell RJ
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):897-903. PubMed ID: 23551179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Food Preferences of the Blow Fly Lucilia cuprina Offered Human Blood, Semen and Saliva, and Various Nonhuman Foods Sources.
Durdle A; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jan; 61(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 26211393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of forensic tests to distinguish blowfly artifacts from human blood, semen, and saliva.
Durdle A; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Mar; 60(2):468-70. PubMed ID: 25407611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Location of Artifacts Deposited by the Blow Fly Lucilia cuprina After Feeding on Human Blood at Simulated Indoor Crime Scenes.
Durdle A; Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RAH
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1261-1268. PubMed ID: 29143327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids.
Thanakiatkrai P; Raham K; Pradutkanchana J; Sotthibandhu S; Kitpipit T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():1-9. PubMed ID: 28605649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of fly artifacts from four species of necrophagous flies on household materials using immunoassays.
Rivers DB; Cavanagh G; Greisman V; Brogan R; Schoeffield A
Int J Legal Med; 2020 May; 134(3):1239-1253. PubMed ID: 31520174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Morphological Features of Regurgitate and Defecatory Stains Deposited by Five Species of Necrophagous Flies are Influenced by Adult Diets and Body Size.
Rivers DB; McGregor A
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):154-161. PubMed ID: 28230912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Alteration of expirated bloodstain patterns by Calliphora vicina and Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) through ingestion and deposition of artifacts.
Striman B; Fujikawa A; Barksdale L; Carter DO
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S123-7. PubMed ID: 21039518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fly artifact documentation of Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) - a forensically important blowfly species in Malaysia.
Zuha RM; Supriyani M; Omar B
Trop Biomed; 2008 Apr; 25(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18600200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA methylation profiling for a confirmatory test for blood, saliva, semen, vaginal fluid and menstrual blood.
Lee HY; Jung SE; Lee EH; Yang WI; Shin KJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():75-82. PubMed ID: 27344518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A 17-month time course study of human RNA and DNA degradation in body fluids under dry and humid environmental conditions.
Sirker M; Schneider PM; Gomes I
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Nov; 130(6):1431-1438. PubMed ID: 27184660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of body fluid-specific DNA methylation markers for use in forensic science.
Park JL; Kwon OH; Kim JH; Yoo HS; Lee HC; Woo KM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim YS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():147-53. PubMed ID: 25128690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advancing forensic RNA typing: On non-target secretions, a nasal mucosa marker, a differential co-extraction protocol and the sensitivity of DNA and RNA profiling.
van den Berge M; Bhoelai B; Harteveld J; Matai A; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():119-129. PubMed ID: 26590860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Developed and evaluated a multiplex mRNA profiling system for body fluid identification in Chinese Han population.
Song F; Luo H; Hou Y
J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Oct; 35():73-80. PubMed ID: 26311108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of body fluid identification and DNA profiling after exposure to tropical weather conditions.
Zapico SC; Stadler C; Roca G
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Mar; 69(2):631-639. PubMed ID: 38146797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct Y-STR amplification of body fluids deposited on commonly found crime scene substrates.
Dargay A; Roy R
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Apr; 39():50-60. PubMed ID: 26854850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developmental validation of the PrepFiler Forensic DNA Extraction Kit for extraction of genomic DNA from biological samples.
Brevnov MG; Pawar HS; Mundt J; Calandro LM; Furtado MR; Shewale JG
J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 19302383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening biological stains with qPCR versus lateral flow immunochromatographic test strips: a quantitative comparison using analytical figures of merit.
Oechsle CS; Haddad S; Sgueglia JB; Grgicak CM
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 24117798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Introducing novel type of human DNA markers for forensic tissue identification: DNA copy number variation allows the detection of blood and semen.
Zubakov D; Chamier-Ciemińska J; Kokmeijer I; Maciejewska A; Martínez P; Pawłowski R; Haas C; Kayser M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():112-118. PubMed ID: 29986230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
