These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24314545)

  • 1. The Pabst's method: an effective and low-budget tool for the forensic comparison of opaque thermoplastics--part 1: Additional discrimination of black electrical tapes.
    Henning S; Schönberger T; Simmross U
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):387-92. PubMed ID: 24314545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic utility of carbon isotope ratio variations in PVC tape backings.
    Dietz ME; Stern LA; Mehltretter AH; Parish A; McLasky V; Aranda R
    Sci Justice; 2012 Mar; 52(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 22325908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elemental analysis of white electrical tapes by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry.
    Sun Z; Quan Y; Sun Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):169-72. PubMed ID: 24053877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The application of isotope ratio mass spectrometry for discrimination and comparison of adhesive tapes.
    Horacek M; Min JS; Heo S; Park J; Papesch W
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2008 Jun; 22(11):1763-6. PubMed ID: 18438979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis and discrimination of electrical tapes: part II. Backings.
    Mehltretter AH; Bradley MJ; Wright DM
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(6):1493-504. PubMed ID: 21883209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soil examination for a forensic trace evidence laboratory--Part 1: Spectroscopic techniques.
    Woods B; Lennard C; Kirkbride KP; Robertson J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Dec; 245():187-94. PubMed ID: 25205526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forensic isotope ratio mass spectrometry of packaging tapes.
    Carter JF; Grundy PL; Hill JC; Ronan NC; Titterton EL; Sleeman R
    Analyst; 2004 Dec; 129(12):1206-10. PubMed ID: 15565219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection of an adhesive tape suitable for forensic fiber sampling.
    De Wael K; Gason FG; Baes CA
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):168-71. PubMed ID: 18279253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification and comparison of electrical tapes using instrumental and statistical techniques: II. Organic composition of the tape backing and adhesive.
    Goodpaster JV; Sturdevant AB; Andrews KL; Briley EM; Brun-Conti L
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 19187453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SEM-EDS analysis and discrimination of forensic soil.
    Cengiz S; Cengiz Karaca A; Cakir I; Bülent Uner H; Sevindik A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Apr; 141(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15066711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Paint and tape: collection and storage of microtraces of paint in adhesive tape.
    Bernhard WR
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Nov; 45(6):1312-5. PubMed ID: 11110189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of pressure sensitive adhesive tape: I. Evaluation of infrared ATR accessory advances.
    Merrill RA; Bartick EG
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Jan; 45(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 10641924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing contrast of fingerprints on plastic tape.
    Steele CA; Ball MS
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Nov; 48(6):1314-7. PubMed ID: 14640277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis and discrimination of electrical tapes: Part I. Adhesives.
    Mehltretter AH; Bradley MJ; Wright DM
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 20887352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.
    Augustin JC; Carlier V
    Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The discrimination of colored acrylic, cotton, and wool textile fibers using micro-Raman spectroscopy. Part 1: in situ detection and characterization of dyes.
    Buzzini P; Massonnet G
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1593-600. PubMed ID: 24147967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chemical fingerprinting of adhesive tapes by GCMS detection of petroleum hydrocarbon products.
    Aziz N; Greenwood PF; Grice K; John Watling R; van Bronswijk W
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1130-7. PubMed ID: 18631281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The current status of forensic science laboratory accreditation in Europe.
    Malkoc E; Neuteboom W
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):121-6. PubMed ID: 16876355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The feasibility of external blind DNA proficiency testing. II. Experience with actual blind tests.
    Peterson JL; Lin G; Ho M; Chen Y; Gaensslen RE
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 12570196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification and comparison of electrical tapes using instrumental and statistical techniques: I. Microscopic surface texture and elemental composition.
    Goodpaster JV; Sturdevant AB; Andrews KL; Brun-Conti L
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 May; 52(3):610-29. PubMed ID: 17456089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.