131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24315397)
21. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography.
Thomas A; Degenhardt F; Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Slowinski T; Fischer T
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 20171905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Breast strain elastography: Observer variability in data acquisition and interpretation.
Dong Y; Zhou C; Zhou J; Yang Z; Zhang J; Zhan W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():157-161. PubMed ID: 29571790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging.
Hall TJ; Zhu Y; Spalding CS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 29(3):427-35. PubMed ID: 12706194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. 2-D locally regularized tissue strain estimation from radio-frequency ultrasound images: theoretical developments and results on experimental data.
Brusseau E; Kybic J; Deprez JF; Basset O
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Feb; 27(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 18334437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.
Kokubu Y; Yamada K; Tanabe M; Izumori A; Kato C; Horii R; Ohno S; Matsueda K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 33389371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Characterization of cysts using differential correlation coefficient values from two dimensional breast elastography: preliminary study.
Booi RC; Carson PL; O'Donnell M; Roubidoux MA; Hall AL; Rubin JM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 34(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 17900795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantitative three-dimensional elasticity imaging from quasi-static deformation: a phantom study.
Richards MS; Barbone PE; Oberai AA
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):757-79. PubMed ID: 19131669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Hybrid algorithm for elastography to visualize both solid and fluid-filled lesions.
Nahiyan A; Hasan MK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1058-78. PubMed ID: 25701523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the SR
Moon JH; Koh SH; Park SY; Hwang JY; Woo JY
Acta Radiol; 2019 Jan; 60(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 29726693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sonographic breast elastography: a primer.
Barr RG
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 May; 31(5):773-83. PubMed ID: 22535725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of Tumor Sizing in Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Strain Elastography, 3-D Ultrasound and Conventional B-Mode Ultrasound with and without Compound Imaging.
Stachs A; Pandjaitan A; Martin A; Stubert J; Hartmann S; Gerber B; Glass Ä
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2758-2765. PubMed ID: 27600473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Automated 3-D Ultrasound Elastography of the Breast: An In Vivo Validation Study.
Hendriks GAGM; Chen C; Mann R; Hansen HHG; de Korte CL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Mar; 50(3):358-363. PubMed ID: 38103946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of precompression on elasticity imaging of the breast: development of a clinically useful semiquantitative method of precompression assessment.
Barr RG; Zhang Z
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Jun; 31(6):895-902. PubMed ID: 22644686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with virtual touch tissue quantification: measurements of normal breast tissue and dependence on the degree of pre-compression.
Wojcinski S; Brandhorst K; Sadigh G; Hillemanns P; Degenhardt F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2226-32. PubMed ID: 24035624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions.
Altıntas Y; Bayrak M; Alabaz Ö; Celiktas M
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 33070635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation.
Schaefer FK; Heer I; Schaefer PJ; Mundhenke C; Osterholz S; Order BM; Hofheinz N; Hedderich J; Heller M; Jonat W; Schreer I
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 19773141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Spatial Compounding Technique to Obtain Rotation Elastogram: A Feasibility Study.
Kothawala A; Chandramoorthi S; Reddy NRK; Thittai AK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1290-1301. PubMed ID: 28433440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
