These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24315598)

  • 1. 'Stochastic' effects at balanced mixtures: a calibration study.
    Pascali VL; Merigioli S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):113-25. PubMed ID: 24315598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Joint Bayesian analysis of forensic mixtures.
    Pascali VL; Merigioli S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):735-48. PubMed ID: 22948016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A stochastic model of the processes in PCR based amplification of STR DNA in forensic applications.
    Weusten J; Herbergs J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 21295532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of mock cases involving complex low template DNA mixtures: A descriptive study.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; de Blaeij TJ; Meulenbroek AJ; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 22613779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures.
    Ladd C; Lee HC; Yang N; Bieber FR
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11387631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different interpretation strategies for low template DNA mixtures.
    Pfeifer CM; Klein-Unseld R; Klintschar M; Wiegand P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 22739132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA mixture genotyping by probabilistic computer interpretation of binomially-sampled laser captured cell populations: combining quantitative data for greater identification information.
    Ballantyne J; Hanson EK; Perlin MW
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 23601717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
    Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures.
    Paoletti DR; Doom TE; Krane CM; Raymer ML; Krane DE
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Nov; 50(6):1361-6. PubMed ID: 16382829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative analysis of powder mixtures by Raman spectrometry: the influence of particle size and its correction.
    Chen ZP; Li LM; Jin JW; Nordon A; Littlejohn D; Yang J; Zhang J; Yu RQ
    Anal Chem; 2012 May; 84(9):4088-94. PubMed ID: 22468859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The low-template-DNA (stochastic) threshold--its determination relative to risk analysis for national DNA databases.
    Gill P; Puch-Solis R; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Mar; 3(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 19215879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Least-square deconvolution: a framework for interpreting short tandem repeat mixtures.
    Wang T; Xue N; Birdwell JD
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1284-97. PubMed ID: 17199614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixture interpretation: Experimental and simulated reevaluation of qualitative analysis.
    Manabe S; Mori Y; Kawai C; Ozeki M; Tamaki K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Mar; 15(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 23089142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validating TrueAllele® DNA mixture interpretation.
    Perlin MW; Legler MM; Spencer CE; Smith JL; Allan WP; Belrose JL; Duceman BW
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(6):1430-47. PubMed ID: 21827458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved strategies and optimization of calibration models for real-time PCR absolute quantification.
    Sivaganesan M; Haugland RA; Chern EC; Shanks OC
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4726-35. PubMed ID: 20701947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of an STR peak area model.
    Cowell RG
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Jun; 3(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19414168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.